Formulation and Development of Spirulina Enriched High Protein Bars for Athletes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21048/IJND.2024.61.2.33894Keywords:
Athletes, spirulina, protein bars, high fibre, high proteinAbstract
An athlete requires physical strength, agility, and stamina, and protein is a crucial factor for assessing sports performance. Athletes, marathon runners, and body builders need a higher protein intake of up to 1.5 to 2 gm/kg/day, depending on age and activity level. 20 to 30% of calorie intake should be proteins. The aim of the study is to formulate and develop protein bars infused with functional foods like spirulina, which will be high in protein, targeted at the sportsperson or athletes to meet their requirements. 5 spirulina-based protein bar combinations were created using high-protein and high-fibre ingredients such as whey protein isolate, inulin, and erythritol. Each serving of the protein bars ranged from 50-80 g, providing 15%-30% of energy from protein, at least 3-5 g of fibre, and 1-2 g of spirulina. The recipes varied with sesame seeds, flax seeds, chia seeds, puffed rice, and almonds. The protein bars underwent standardisation in three phases. A semi-trained panel of nutrition experts evaluated the bars using a 9-point hedonic rating scale in each phase, and recipe modifications were made accordingly. In phase 3, the chocolate-coated almond protein bar was deemed the most acceptable and underwent shelf life evaluation, chemical, physical, and microbiological analysis, with data analysed using SPSS version 20. In Phase 1, five energy bars were evaluated for taste, texture, and color, with S-E receiving the highest mean taste rating, followed by S-A, S-D, S-B, and S-C. Overall, S-A, S-D, and S-E were found to be the most acceptable. In Phase 2, S-C (Spirulina + Almonds) was rated highest in taste and texture, making it the best option in terms of overall acceptability. However, S-A had the best color. From all three phases of sensory evaluation, S-A (Spirulina + Almonds - chocolate coated) had the highest mean score for all four sensory attributes, with a ranking scale score also the highest. The protein bar showed no major changes during the 30-day shelf-life analysis, and the taste was acceptable. In Phase 1, five energy bars were evaluated for taste, texture, and color, with S-E receiving the highest mean taste rating, followed by S-A, S-D, S-B, and S-C. Overall, S-A, S-D, and S-E were found to be the most acceptable. In Phase 2, S-C (Spirulina + Almonds) was rated highest in taste and texture, making it the best option in terms of overall acceptability. However, S-A had the best color. From all three phases of sensory evaluation, S-A (Spirulina + Almonds - chocolate coated) had the highest mean score for all four sensory attributes, with a ranking scale score also the highest. The protein bar showed no major changes during the 30-day shelf-life analysis, and the taste was acceptable.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muskan Barmare, Rekha Battalwar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All the articles published in IJND are distributed under a creative commons license. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright of their work (all usages allowed except for commercial purpose).
Please contact us at editor@informaticsglobal.com for permissions related to commercial use of the article(s).
References
Phillips, S.M. Nutritional supplements in support of resistance exercise to counter age-related sarcopenia. Adv. Nutr., 2015, 6, 452S-460S. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.115.008367
Thomas, D.T., Erdman, K.A. and Burke, L.M. American college of sports medicine joint position statement. Nutrition and Athletic Performance. Med. Sci. Sports. Exercise, 2016, 48, 543-568. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000852
Stellingwerff, T. and Cox, G.R. Systematic review: Carbohydrate supplementation on exercise performance or capacity of varying durations. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metabol., 2014, 39, 998-1011. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2014-0027
Elaine C. Lee, K., Nieman, D.C., Manore, M. M. and Henson, D.A. Post-exercise carbohydrate-protein supplementation: Phosphorylation of muscle proteins involved in glucose uptake and glycogen synthesis. Amino Acids, 2017, 49, 609-618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-017-2379-6
Betts, J.A., Williams, C., Duffy, K., Gunner, F. and Theodorescu, D. Energy expenditure and intake during high-intensity intermittent exercise: The role of carbohydrate availability. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exercise Metabol., 2015, 25, 426-434. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsnem.2014-0203
Jeukendrup, A.E. and McLaughlin, J. Carbohydrate ingestion during exercise: Effects on performance, training adaptations and trainability of the gut. Nestlé Nutrition Institute Workshop Series, 2011, 69, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1159/000329276
Sadeghi, A., Parsaeimehr, M., Ebrahimi, S. and Ghalavand, M. Spirulina platensis: A nutrient-rich microalgae with antioxidant and performance-enhancing effects. J. Dietary Suppl., 2022, 19, 92-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/19390211.2021.1989218
Boukary, A., Ibrahim, O., Issoufou, M. and Malam, Y.A. The effectiveness of spirulina on athletes’ performance and its side effects: A systematic review. J. Nutr. Metabol., 2021, 2021, 9872403. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9872403
Mariana Lares-Michel, J., Vega-Vega, O., González-Vargas, L.D. and Medina-Inojosa, J.R. Protein intake in athletes and active adults: From requirements to optimal intake. J. Clin. Med., 2022, 11, 455. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030455
Saharan, B.S. and Jood, S. Nutraceutical potential of spirulina: A review. J. Food Sci. Technol., 2021, 58, 1847-1859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-020-04566-5
Batista de Oliveira, L., Rodrigues Faria, F. and Lannes, S.C.S. Milk chocolates with Spirulina platensis biomass: Physicochemical properties and consumer acceptance. Food Res. Int., 2021, 141, 110118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.110118
Sołowiej, B.G., Kowalska, H., Krystyjan, M. and Ziobro, R. Effect of inulin addition on nutritional and sensory properties of whey protein bars. Foods, 2021, 10, 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10010109
Mamatha, B.S., Nivedhitha, M.S. and Shravya, K. Sugar substitutes- A review. J. Food Sci. Technol., 2021, 58, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-020-04506-3
Childs, J., Yates, L.A. and Drake, M.A. Modification of sensory properties of a whey protein fortified nutrition bar. J. Sensory Studies, 2007, 22, 81-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.2006.00075.x
Ramesh, P. and Nagarajan, S. Microencapsulated spirulina incorporated snacks: An approach towards value addition. J. Food Sci. Technol., 2018, 55, 1264-1274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-017-3011-x
Zhang, J., Li, S., Liu, T., Li, J., He, X., Li, F. and Li, X. Microbiological quality evaluation of retail sushi in Hangzhou, China. Food Control, 2020, 112, 107129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107129
Ahmed, A., Rahman, A., Rahman, S.M.A. and Farzana, T. Microbiological evaluation of raw chicken meat sold in retail stores of Dhaka city, Bangladesh. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82333-2