The 5W1H Framework of Consumption of Plant-Based Meat: A Systematic Literature Review

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Akanksha Aggarwal
     Department of Management and Commerce, Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Learning, Anantapur - 515 134, Andhra Pradesh ,IN
  • Aksha Bajpai
     Department of Management and Commerce, Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Learning, Anantapur - 515 134, Andhra Pradesh ,IN ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2160-3279

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21048/IJND.2024.61.2.35361

Keywords:

Plant-based meat, TCCM (Theory, Context, Characteristics, Method), consumer behaviour, meat alternative, systematic literature review, 5W1H framework

Abstract

Plant-based meat, a new eco-friendly and animal-friendly replacement of meat is an emerging substitute in the market necessitating the need to understand its dynamic and ambiguous consumer behaviour. For this purpose, this study aims to consolidate the extant research in the field to understand the shift towards plant-based meat consumption and to provide future research directions. In total, 100 articles were identified as relevant for this review after an elaborate, rigorous and systematic screening procedure using the PRISMA review protocol. The analysis used a hybrid framework employing the TCCM (Theory, Context, Characteristics and Method) framework and was further outlined using the 5W-1H approach. The study discusses important marketing insights for practitioners and also provides directions for future research avenues.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-11

How to Cite

Aggarwal, A., & Bajpai, A. (2024). The 5W1H Framework of Consumption of Plant-Based Meat: A Systematic Literature Review. The Indian Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics, 61(2), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.21048/IJND.2024.61.2.35361

Issue

Volume 61, Issue 2, April-June 2024

Section

Original Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Akanksha Aggarwal, Aksha Bajpai

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

All the articles published in IJND are distributed under a creative commons license. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright of their work (all usages allowed except for commercial purpose).

Please contact us at editor@informaticsglobal.com for permissions related to commercial use of the article(s).

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

 

References

Kemper, J.A. Motivations, barriers, and strategies for meat reduction at different family lifecycle stages. Appetite, 2020, 150, 104644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104644

Circus, V.E. and Robison, R. Exploring perceptions of sustainable proteins and meat attachment. Br. Food J., 2019, 121, 533-545. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-01-2018-0025

Tso, R., Lim, A.J. and Forde, C.G. A Critical appraisal of the evidence supporting consumer motivations for alternative proteins. Foods, 2020, 10, 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10010024

Hartmann, C. and Siegrist, M. Consumer perception and behaviour regarding sustainable protein consumption: A systematic review. Trds. Food Sci. Technol., 2017, 61, 11-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2016.12.006

Tobi, R.C., Harris, F., Rana, R., Brown, K.A., Quaife, M. and Green, R. Sustainable diet dimensions. Comparing consumer preference for nutrition, environmental and social responsibility food labelling: A systematic review. Sustainability, 2019, 11, 6575. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236575

Onwezen, M.C., Bouwman, E.P., Reinders, M.J. and Dagevos, H. A systematic review on consumer acceptance of alternative proteins: Pulses, algae, insects, plant-based meat alternatives, and cultured meat. Appetite, 2021, 159, 105058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.105058

Weinrich, R. Opportunities for the adoption of health-based sustainable dietary patterns: a review on consumer research of meat substitutes. Sustainability, 2019, 11, 4028. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154028

Siddiqui, S.A., Bahmid, N.A., Mahmud, C.M., Boukid, F., Lamri, M. and Gagaoua, M. Consumer acceptability of plant, seaweed, and insect-based foods as alternatives to meat: a critical compilation of a decade of research. Cri. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 2022, 63, 6630-6651, https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2022.2036096

Lonkila, A. and Kaljonen, M., Promises of meat and milk alternatives: An integrative literature review on emergent research themes. Agriculture and Human Values, 2021, 38, 625-639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10184-9

Jahn, S., Furchheim, P. and Strassner, A.M. Plant-based meat alternatives: Motivational adoption barriers and solutions. Sustainability, 2021, 13, 13271. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313271

Szenderak, J., Frona, D. and Rakos, M. consumer acceptance of plant-based meat substitutes: A narrative review. Foods, 2022, 11, 1274. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11091274

Paul, J., Khatri, P. and Kaur Duggal, H. Frameworks for developing impactful systematic literature reviews and theory building: What, Why and How? J. Decision Systems, 2023, 1-14. 10.1080/12460125.2023.2197700

PRISMA. PRISMA Endorsers, 2023.

Paul, J. and Rosado-Serrano, A. Gradual internationalization vs born-global/international new venture models: A review and research agenda. Int. Market. Rev., 2019, 36, 6, 830-858. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-10-2018-0280

Paul, J., Altaf, M., Dwivedi, K.Y. and Rose, G. Writing an impactful review article: What do we know and what do we need to know? J. Busin. Res., 2021, 133, 337-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.005

Stigler, G.J. and Becker, G.S. De gustibus non est disputandum. The Am. Econ. Rev., 1977, 67, 76-90.

Ajzen, I. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. Springer Berlin Heidelberg., 1985, 11-39.

Hopper, E. What Is the Elaboration Likelihood Model in Psychology?, 2019. https://www.thoughtco.com/elaboration-likelihood-model-4686036

Bourdieu, P. Symbolic power. Critique of Anthropology, 1977, 4, 13-14.

Stiles, G., Collins, J., and Beck, K.L. Effectiveness of strategies to decrease animal-sourced protein and/or increase plant-sourced protein in food service settings: A systematic literature review. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet., 2022, 122, 1013-1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2021.12.010

Apostolidis, C. and McLeay, F. Should we stop meating like this? Reducing meat consumption through substitution. Food policy, 2016, 65, 74-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.11.002

Collier, E. S., Oberrauter, L.M., Normann, A., Norman, C., Svensson, M., Niimi, J. and Bergman, P. Identifying barriers to decreasing meat consumption and increasing acceptance of meat substitutes among Swedish consumers. Appetite, 2021, 167, 105643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105643

Gravely, E. and Fraser, E. Transitions on the shopping floor: Investigating the role of Canadian supermarkets in alternative protein consumption. Appetite, 2018, 130,146-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.08.018

Schosler, H., de Boer, J. and Boersema, J.J. Can we cut out the meat of the dish? Constructing consumer-oriented pathways towards meat substitution. Appetite, 2012, 58, 39-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.09.009

Stubbs, R., Scott, S. and Duarte, C. Responding to food, environment and health challenges by changing meat consumption behaviours in consumers. Nutr. Bull., 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/nbu.12318

Van Loo, E.J., Caputo, V. and Lusk, J.L. Consumer preferences for farm-raised meat, lab-grown meat, and plant-based meat alternatives: Does information or brand matter? Food Policy, 2020, 95, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101931

Escribano, A.J., Pena, M. B., Diaz-Caro, C., Elghannam, A., Crespo-Cebada, E. and Mesias, F.J. Stated preferences for plant-based and cultured meat: A choice experiment study of Spanish consumers. sustainability, 2021, 13, 8235. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158235

Bryant, C. and Sanctorum, H. Alternative proteins, evolving attitudes: Comparing consumer attitudes to plant-based and cultured meat in Belgium in two consecutive years. Appetite, 2021, 161, 105161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105161

de Koning, W., Dean, D., Vriesekoop, F., Aguiar, L.K., Anderson, M., Mongondry, P. and Boereboom, A. Drivers and inhibitors in the acceptance of meat alternatives: the case of plant and insect-based proteins. Foods, 2020, 9, 1292. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9091292

Grasso, A.C., Hung, Y., Olthof, M.R., Verbeke, W. and Brouwer, I.A. Older consumers’ readiness to accept alternative, more sustainable protein sources in the European Union. Nutr., 2019, 11, 1904. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11081904

Michel, F., Hartmann, C. and Siegrist, M. Consumers associations, perceptions and acceptance of meat and plant based meat alternatives. Food Quality and Preference, 2021, 87, 104063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104063

Kerslake, E., Kemper, J.A. and Conroy, D. What’s your beef with meat substitutes? Exploring barriers and facilitators for meat substitutes in omnivores, vegetarians, and vegans. Appetite, 2022, 170,105864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105864

Aschemann-Witzel, J., Gantriis, R.F., Fraga, P. and Perez-Cueto, F.J. Plant-based food and protein trend from a business perspective: Markets, consumers, and the challenges and opportunities in the future. Criti. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 2021, 61, 3119-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2020.1793730

Siegrist, M. and Hartmann, C. Impact of sustainability perception on consumption of organic meat and meat substitutes. Appetite, 2019, 132, 196-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.09.016

Sucapane, D., Roux, C. and Sobol, K. Exploring how product descriptors and packaging colors impact consumers’ perceptions of plant-based meat alternative products. Appetite, 2021, 167, 105590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105590

Jang, H.W. and Cho, M. Application of the constraint negotiation theory to the plant-based meat alternatives food service business: An exploration of perceived value and negotiation–constraint–visit intention relationships. Sustainability, 2022, 14, 5812. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105812

Cliceri, D., Spinelli, S., Dinnella, C., Prescott, J. and Monteleone, E. The influence of psychological traits, beliefs and taste responsiveness on implicit attitudes toward plant- and animal-based dishes among vegetarians, flexitarians and omnivores. Food Quality and Preference, 2018, 68, 276-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.03.020

Estell, M., Hughes, J. and Grafenauer, S. Plant protein and plant-based meat alternatives: consumer and nutrition professional attitudes and perceptions. Sustainability, 2021, 13, 1478. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031478

Spendrup, S. and Hovmalm, H.P. Consumer attitudes and beliefs towards plant-based food in different degrees of processing- The case of Sweden. Food Quality and Preference, 2022, 102, 104673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104673

Gomez-Luciano, C.A., de Aguiar, L.K., Vriesekoop, F. and Urbano, B. Consumers’ willingness to purchase three alternatives to meat proteins in the United Kingdom, Spain, Brazil and the Dominican Republic. Food Quality and Preference, 2019, 78, 103732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103732

Arora, R.S., Brent, D.A. and Jaenicke, E.C. Is India ready for alt-meat? Preferences and willingness to pay for meat alternatives. Sustainability, 2020, 12, 4377. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114377

Hwang, J., You, J., Moon, J. and Jeong, J. Factors affecting consumers’ alternative meats buying intentions: Plant-based meat alternative and cultured meat. Sustainability, 2020, 12, 5662. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145662

Padilha, L.G., Malek, L. and Umberger, W.J. Consumers’ attitudes towards lab-grown meat, conventionally raised meat and plant-based protein alternatives. Food Quality and Preference, 2022, 99,104573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104573

Elzerman, J.E., van Dijk, P.E. and Luning, P.A. Substituting meat and the role of a situational context: exploring associations and motives of Dutch meat substitute-users. Ecolog. Econ., 2022, 13, 93-108. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-09-2021-1051

Goetze, F. and Brunner, T.A. A Consumer segmentation study for meat and meat alternatives in Switzerland. Foods, 2021, 10, 1273. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10061273

Motoki, K., Park, J., Spence, C. and Velasco, C. Contextual acceptance of novel and unfamiliar foods: Insects, cultured meat, plant-based meat alternatives, and 3D printed foods. Food Quality and Preference, 2022, 96, 104368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104368

Pointke, M., Ohlau, M., Risius, A. and Pawelzik, E. Plant-based only: investigating consumers’ sensory perception, motivation and knowledge of different plant-based alternative products on the marke. Foods, 2022, 11, 2339. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11152339

Hartmann, C. and Siegrist, M. Our daily meat: Justification, moral evaluation and willingness to substitute. Food Quality and Preference, 2020, 80, 103799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103799

Carlsson, F., Kataria, M., and Lampi, E. How much does it take? Willingness to switch to meat substitutes. Ecolog. Econ., 2022, 193, 107329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107329