The Relationship Between Fiscal Deficit and Inflation in India: A Cointegration Analysis
Keywords:
Exchange Rate, Fiscal Deficit, Granger Causality, Inflation, Johansen Cointegration, Money SupplyAbstract
Maintaining price stability is an important macroeconomic goal for sustainability of economic growth. Fiscal deficit has come to be widely regarded as the key player in determining inflation dynamics. Theoretical insights on inflation, however, give a contrasting view on the inflationary tendencies of fiscal deficit. The fiscal theory of price level suggests that persistent budget deficits can result in inflation, while the monetarists consider inflation to be a monetary phenomenon. The structural economists attribute rising prices to the changes in demand and supply constraints while Ricardian Equivalence Hypothesis views fiscal deficit and inflation to be independent of each other. In light of these competing theoretical views on the factors affecting inflation, this study empirically examines the equilibrium relationship between fiscal deficit, money supply, exchange rate and inflation using Indian annual data for the period 1970-71 to 2014-15. The econometric framework used for the analysis is the Johansen cointegration technique, which tests both the existence and the number of cointegrating vectors. Furthermore, for testing the short-run causality, Granger Causality tests have been employed. The results show that there exists a long-run relationship between fiscal deficit, money supply, exchange rate volatility and inflation. Granger Causality tests do not confirm the causality running from fiscal deficit to inflation. This implies that the fiscal theory of the price level does not find empirical support in the Indian case. Given these findings, the efficacy of fiscal deficit as an instrument of price stabilisation in the short-run is questioned.Downloads
Metrics
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All the articles published in JBT are distributed under a creative commons license. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright of their work (all usages allowed except for commercial purpose).Accepted 2018-05-16
Published 2018-05-16
References
Acharya, S. (2010). Macroeconomic Performance and Policies, 2000-2008. In S. Acharya and R.
Mohan (Eds.), India's economy, performance and challenges: Essays in honour of Montek Singh Ahluwalia (pp.39-81). New Delhi: OUP.
Agba, V. A. (1994). Principles of macroeconomics,. Lagos: Concept Publication Ltd.
Agha, A. I. and Khan, M. S. (2006). An empirical analysis of fiscal imbalances and inflation in Pakistan. SBP Research Bulletin 2(2), 343-362.
Akcay, O.C., Alper, C.E., and Ozmucur, S. (1996), Budget deficit, money supply and inflation: Evidence from low and high frequency data for Turkey. Bogazici University, Department of Economics.
Ashra, S., Chattopadhyay, S. and K. Chaudhuri; K. (2004). deficit, money and price – The Indian experience. Journal of Policy Modeling. 26, 289- 299.
Barro, R.J. (1974). Are government bonds net wealth? Journal of Political Economy, 82, 1095-1117.Barro, R. J. (1989). The Ricardian Approach to Budget Deficits. (NBER Working Paper No. 268).
Bassetto, M and Butters. R.A. (2010). What is the relationship between large deficits and inflation in industrialized countries? Economic Perspectives,3, 83-100.
Bayo, F. (2011). Determinants of inflation in Nigeria: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(18), 262-271.
Bhattacharya, R., Patnaik, I., and Shah, A. (2008). Exchange rate pass-through in India.
Macro/Finance Group at National Institute of Public Finance and Policy,[Online]. Available at: http://macrofinance. nipfp. org. in/PDF/BPS2008_erpt. pdf.
Biswas, B., and Saunders, P.J. (1990). Money and price level in India: An empirical analysis. Indian Economic Journal, 35, 103-113.
Bitzis, J., Paleologos, M. and Papazoglou C. (2008). The determinants of the Greek current account deficit: The EMU experience. Journal of International and Global Economic Studies, 1(1), 105-122.
Bobai, F.D., Ubangida, S. and Umar, Y.S. (2013). An assessment of exchange rate volatility and inflation in Nigeria. Journal of Emerging Issues in Economics, Finance and Banking, 1(4), 321-340.
Burdekin, R.K. and Burketi, P. (1996). Hyperinflation, the exchange rate and endogenous money: Post-World War I Germany revisited. Journal of International Money and Finance, 15(4), 599-621.
Canzoneri, M.B., Cumby, R.E. and Diba, B.T. (2001). Is the price level determined by the needs of fiscal solvency? American Economic Review, 91(5), 1221-38.
Carlstrom, C.T. and Fuerst, T.S. (2000). The fiscal theory of the price level. Economic ReviewFederal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, 36(1), 22-32.
Catí£o, L., and Terrones, M. (2003). Fiscal deficit and inflation. (IMF Working Paper No.03/65). Chhibber, A. and Shafik, N. (1990). Exchange reform, parallel markets, and inflation in Africa. (World Bank PPR Working Paper Series, 427).
Darrat, A. F. and Barnhart, S. (1988). Budget deficits, money growth and causality: Further OECD evidence. Journal of International Money and Finance, 231-242.
Darrat, A.F. (2000). Are budget deficits inflationary? A reconsideration of the evidence. Applied Economics Letters, 7(10), 633–36.
Ebiringa, T.O. (1998). The macroeconomic impact of public sector deficits: An empirical study of Nigeria (1988 –1997). Unpublished M.Sc. Research Work, Owerri, FUTO.
Edwards, S., and Tabellini, G. (1991). Explaining fiscal policies and inflation in developing countries.
Journal of International Money and Finance, 10(1), 16-48.
Ezeabasili, V.N. (2009). The effects of fiscal deficits on selected macroeconomic variables in Nigeria (1970-2006). Un- published Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Banking and Finance, NnamdiAzikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria.
Fischer, S., Sahay, R. and Vegh. C.A. (2002). Modern hyper and high inflations. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(3), 837-880.
Friedman, M. (1963). Inflation: Causes and Consequences. New York: Asia Publishing House.
Friedman, M. (1992). Money mischief: Episodes in monetary history. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37 (3), 424-438.
De Grauwe, P., and Grimaldi, M.(2001). Exchange rates, prices and money: A long-run perspective.
International Journal of Finance and Economics, 6(4), 289-313.
Gupta, G.S. (1984). Monetary target setting. Ahmedabad: Indian Institute of Management, India.
Hamburger, M. J., and Zwick, B. (1981). Deficits, money and inflation. Journal of Monetary Economics, 7(1).
Hondroyiannis, G., and Papapetrou, E. (1997). Are budget deficits inflationary? A cointegration approach. Applied Economics Letters, 4(8), 493-496.
Honohan, P., and Lane, P.R. (2003). Divergent inflation rates in EMU. Economic Policy, 37, 359-94.
Jadhav, N. (1994), Monetary economics for India. New Delhi: Macmillan India Limited.
Jha, R. (2001). Macroeconomics of fiscal policy in developing countries. (Australian National University, Departmental Working Papers, 2001-05).
Johansen, S., and K. Juselius (1990).Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169210.
Khumalo, J. (2013). Budget deficit- inflation nexus in South Africa: VAR analysis. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(13), 415-424.
Khundrakpam, J. K., and Goyal, R. (2008). Is the government deficit for India still relevant for stabilisation? RBI Occasional Papers, 29(3).
Khundrakpam, J. K., and Patanaik, S. (2010). Fiscal stimulus and potential inflationary risks: An empirical assessment of fiscal deficit and inflation relationship in India, Journal of Economic Integration, 25, 703-721.
Khundrakpam, J.K., and Pattanaik, S. (2010). Global crisis, fiscal response and medium-term risks to inflation in India. RBI Occasional Papers, 31(2).
Leeper, E.M. (1991). Equilibria under 'active' and 'passive' monetary and fiscal policies. Journal of Monetary Economics, 27(1), 129-147.
MacKinnon, J. G. (1996). Numerical distribution functions for unit root and cointegration tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11, 601+618.
MacKinnon, J. G., Haug, A. A., and Michelis, L. (1999). Numerical distribution functions of likelihood ratio tests for cointegration. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 14, 563-577.
Mankiw, N. G. (2012). Macroeconomics. Worth Publishers / Palgrave Macmillan.
Makochekanwa, A. (2011). Impact of budget deficit on inflation in Zimbabwe. The Economic Research Guardian, 1(2), 49-59.
Marimon, R. (2001). The fiscal theory of money as an unorthodox financial theory of the firm. In Monetary Theory as a Basis for Monetary Policy (pp. 72-95). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
McMillin, W.D., and Beard, T.R. (1982). Deficits, money and inflation: Comment. Journal of Monetary Economics, 10(2), 273-277.
Mundle, S., Bhanumurthy, N.R and Das, S. (2011). Fiscal consolidation with high growth: A policy simulation model for India. Economic Modelling, 28(6), 2657–2668.
Nachane, D.M., and Nadkarni, R.M. (1985). Empirical tests of certain monetarist propositions via causality theory. Indian Economic Journal, 33, 139-155.
Nelson, E. (2003). The future of monetary policy aggregates in monetary policy analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50, 1029-1059.
Ndebbio, J. E. (1998). Fiscal deficits and inflationary process in an open economy: The case of Nigeria. The Nigerian Journal of Economics and Social Studies, 40(3), 411-431.
Nguyen, V.B. (2015). Effects of Fiscal Deficit and Money M2 Supply on Inflation: Evidence from Selected Economies of Asia. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 20, 49-53.
Nguyen, T. T. H., and Nguyen, D. T. (2010). Macroeconomic determinants of Vietnam's inflation 2000-2010: Evidence and analysis. (Vietnam Centre For Economic and Policy Research Working Paper).
Raj, J., Dhal, S., and Jain, R. (2008). Imported inflation: The evidence from India. RBI Occasional Papers, 29(3).
Ramachandra, V.S. (1983). Direction of causality between monetary and real variables in India – An empirical result. Indian Economic Journal, 31, 65-76.
Ramachandra, V.S. (1986). Direction of causality between monetary and real variables in India – An extended result. Indian Economic Journal, 34, 98-102.
Reserve Bank of India (2015).Handbook of Statistics of the Indian Economy, 2015. Mumbai: RBI.
Ricardo, D. (1820). Letter to Malthus TR. in collected works.
Roubini, N. (1991).Economic and political determinants of budget deficits in developing countries. Journal of International Money and Finance, 10(1), 49–72.
Sargent, T. J., and Wallace, N. (1981). Some unpleasant monetarist arithmetic. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, 5(3), 1-17.
Sims, C.A. (1994). A simple model for study of the determination of the price level and the empirical assessment of fiscal deficit and inflation relationship in India, Journal of Economic Integration, 25, 703-721.
Sims, C.A. (1994). A simple model for study of the determination of the price level and the interaction of monetary and fiscal policy. Economic Theory, 4(3), 381–399.
Singh, B. (1989). Money supply-prices causality revisited. Economic and Political Weekly, 24(47), 2613-2615.
Solomon, M., and De Wet, W. A. (2004). The effect of a budget deficit on inflation: The case of Tanzania. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 7(1), 100-116.
Taylor, J.B. (1993). Discretion versus policy rules in practice. In Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy (Vol. 39, pp. 195-214).
Thornton, Daniel L. (1990). Do government deficits matter? Federal Bank of St. Louis Review, 72(5), 25-39.
Tiwari, A. K., and Tiwari, A. P. (2011). Fiscal deficit and inflation: An empirical analysis for India. The Romanian Economic Journal, 14(42), 131-158.
Tiwari, A., Tiwari, A., and Pandey, P. (2012). Fiscal deficit and inflation: What causes what? The case of India. Journal of International Business and Economy, 13(1), 57-81.
Woodford, M. (1994). Monetary policy and price level determinacy in a cash-in-advance economy. Economic Theory, 4(3), 345-380.
Woodford, M. (1995). Price-level determinacy without control of a monetary aggregate. In CarnegieRochester Conference Series on Public Policy, (Vol. 43, pp.1-46).