Characterization of Sludge Samples from Different Msme Units in Kolkata
Keywords:
Industrialization, Sludge, Chromium, Cobalt, Bioremediation, Heavy metals, Cation exchange capacity, Electrical conductivity..Abstract
Industrialization and urbanization pose threat to environment for heavy metal contamination, and this has been a matter of concern of all. Heavy metals beyond the permissible limit are very hazardous for living being. Monitoring of the physico-chemical properties and heavy metal content of the sludge samples releasing from different industries which gets mixed with the soil are necessary from the public point of view. The present study consists of physicochemical properties and heavy metal content of sludge samples of different MSME in Kolkata, India. For this analysis 12 sludge samples were collected from different industries like Paint, Galvanizing, Electroplating, Tannery, etc. Physicochemical properties such as pH, Electrical conductivity, Organic carbon, Nitrogen, P2O5, K2O, Cation Exchange Capacity, Moisture Content, Sulphur and Water Holding Capacity (WHC), and metals like, Chromium, Nickel, Copper, Zinc, Cadmium, Lead, Cobalt, Ferrous, Manganese, Magnesium and Calcium were analysed. It has been observed that for toxicity Chromium and Cobalt are in steady amount and must be remediated. As the sludges are good for microorganisms’ growth, the heavy metals (especially Chromium and Cobalt) should be bioremediated by growing microorganisms as microorganisms have the property to biologically remediate the heavy metals.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
All the articles published in JES are distributed under a creative commons license. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright of their work (all usages allowed except for commercial purpose).
Please contact us at editorgjeis@gmail.com for permissions related to commercial use of the article(s).
References
Bai, W., Kong, L. and Guo, A. 2013. Effects of physical properties on electrical conductivity of compacted lateritic soil. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng., 5(5): 406-411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2013.07.003. (https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775513000711)
Billings, S. A., Lajtha, K., Malhotra, A., Berhe, A. A., de Graaff, M.-A. et al. 2021. Soil organic carbon is not just for soil scientists: measurement recommendations for diverse practitioners. Ecol. Appl., 31(3): e02290. DOI: 10.1002/ eap.2290
Blanco-Canqui, H., Shapiro, C. A., Wortmann, C. S., Drijber, R. A., Mamo, M. et al. 2013. Soil organic carbon: the value to soil properties. J. Soil Water Conserv., 68(5): 129A-134A. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.68.5.129A
Brischke, C. and Wegener, F. L. 2019. Impact of water holding capacity and moisture content of soil substrates on the moisture content of wood in terrestrial microcosms. Forests, 10: 485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f10060485
Corwin, D. and Lesch, S. 2003. Application of soil electrical conductivity to precision agriculture: theory, principles, and guidelines. Agron J., 95(3): 455-471. DOI: 10.2134/agronj2003.4550
Deb, P., Debnath, P. and Pattanaaik, S. 2013. Physico-chemical properties and water holding capacity of cultivated soils along altitudinal gradient in South Sikkim, India. Indian J. Agric. Res., 48(2): 120-126. DOI: 10.5958/j.0976-058X.48.2.020
Faisal, M. and Hasnain, S. 2006. Hazardous impact of chromium on environment and its appropriate remediations. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 1: 248-258. DOI: 10.3923/
jpt.2006.248.258 URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jpt.2006.248.258
Faria, M., Bertocco, T., Barroso, A., Carvalho, M., Fonseca, F. et al. 2023. A comparison of analytical methods for the determination of soil pH: case study on burned soils in Northern Portugal. Fire, 6(6): 227. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.3390/fire6060227
Lambers, H. and Barrow, N. J. 2020. Pervasive use of CaO, MgO, and basic cations, none of which exist in soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 56: 743-745. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1007/s00374-020-01486-5
Liu, J., Shen, Q., Wei, F., Guo, Z. and Tian, Y. 2020. Differentiation of digestion method for heavy metals in river sediments based on organic matter gradients. IOP Conf. Ser. : Earth Environ. Sci., 467: 012128. DOI: 10.1088/1755- 1315/467/1/012128
Ma, J., Cheng, J., Wang, J., Pan, R., Fang He, F. et al. 2022. Rapid detection of total nitrogen content in soil based on hyperspectral technology. Inf. Process. Agric., 9(4): 566-574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2021.06.005 (https:// www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214317321000548)
Pandey, G. and Sharma, M. 2014. Heavy metals causing toxicity in animals and fishes. Res. J. Animal, Veterinary and Fishery Sci., 2(2): 17-23.
Rai, A., Singh, A. K., Mishra, R., Shahi, B., Rai, V. et al. 2020. Sulphur in soils and plants: an overview. Int. Res. J. Appl. Chem., 21(10): 66-70. DOI: 10.9734/ IRJPAC/2020/v21i1030209
Sainepo, B. M., Gachene, C. K. and Karuma, A. 2018. Assessment of soil organic carbon fractions and carbon management index under different land use types in Olesharo Catchment, Narok County, Kenya. Carbon Balance Manage., 13(1): 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-018-0091-7
Tan, B., You, W., Tian, S., Xiao, T., Wang, M. et al. 2022. Soil nitrogen content detection based on near-infrared spectroscopy. Sensors, 22: 8013. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.3390/s22208013
Tomašić, M., Zgorelec, Ž., A. and Ivica, Kisic, I. 2013. Cation exchange capacity of dominant soil types in the Republic of Croatia. J. Cent. Eur. Agric., 14(3): 84-98. DOI: 10.5513/JCEA01/14.3.1286
Yunan, D., Xianliang, Q. and Xiaochen, W. 2018. Study on cation exchange capacity of agricultural soils. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., 392(4): 042039. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/392/4/042039.