Application of Geotextiles to Improve Soil Properties and Productivity Under Maize Crop in Inceptisols
Keywords:
Non-woven geotextiles, Moisture use efficiency, Bulk density.Abstract
At the University farm of Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Gayespur, Nadia district of West Bengal, kharif maize was used as the test crop in a field experiment to examine the impact of different geotextiles management on crop productivity and soil properties, particularly on changes in soil moisture. Four treatment combinations were applied as T1-non-woven coco coir geotextiles (5 tons + NPK=50:30:20 kg/ha), T2 -non woven jute geotextile (5 tons + NPK=50:30:20 kg/ha), T3- non woven vetiver root geotextiles (5 tons + NPK=50:30:20 kg/ha) and T4- farmer’s practices (i.e., control) (NPK-50:30:20 kg/ha) in RBD design with three replications. The yield of the maize crop was recorded as 36.25 q/ha, 36.68 q/ha, 37.83 q/ha and 31.94 q/ha and 4.31 q/ha (13.49%), 3.74 q/ha (11.7%) and 5.89 q/ha (18.44%) irrespectively in non woven coco coir geo textile, non woven jute geo textile, non-woven vetiver root geo textile and control (farmer’s practice). The Moisture Use Efficiency (MUE) was highest under treatment of vetiver root geotextiles than other and recorded its response of 7.63% over control. Significantly decrease of bulk density and corresponding increase of porosity were found by the application of geotextiles. The effect of organic carbon was more prominent (50 %) under vetiver root geotextiles than control. Similar effect of vetiver root geotextiles also noted for improving nutrient availability. The current study indicate that vetiver root geotextiles were the most effective in maintaining the soil’s friable state, which in turn serves to promote nutrient and water availability and, ultimately, boost crop output.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
All the articles published in JES are distributed under a creative commons license. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright of their work (all usages allowed except for commercial purpose).
Please contact us at editorgjeis@gmail.com for permissions related to commercial use of the article(s).
References
Adhikary, R. and Ravi Sankar, L. 2018. Use of geotextiles for improving crop productivity on groundnut in inceptisols. Int. J. Chem. Stud., 6(5): 2673-2678.
Bhattacharyya, R., Davies, K., Fullen, M. A. and Booth, C. A. 2008. Soil conservation using palm-mat geotextiles on loamy sand soils in the United Kingdom. In: Proceedings of the International Soil Conservation (ISCO) Conference, Budapest, pp. 19-23.
Black, C. A. 1965. Methods of Soil Analysis. American Society of Agronomy, Inc.
Jackson, M. L. 1967. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India.
Jo, I. S. 2010. Effect of organic fertilizer on soil physical properties and plant growth. Technical Bulletin, 113: 16-19.
Kanal, A. and Kuldeep, P. 2008. Direct and residual effect of different organic fertilizer on potato and cereals. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 171(3): 185-195.
Rajagopal, K. and Ramakrishna, S. 1997. Degradation behaviour of coco geotextiles within clay soils. Geosynthetics Asia ‘97, 26-29 November, Bangalore, India, pp. VI.33-VI.40.
Ranganathan, S. R. 1994. Development and potential of jute geotextiles. Geotext. Geomembranes, 13(6-7): 421-433.
Raschle, R. 1989. Microbial influence on cellulose textile and microbiological testing. J. Int. Biodeterioration, 25(1-3): 237-244.
Sahu, A. K., Patil, C. L. and Abrol, I. P. 1978. The modifying effect of electrolyte concentration on the effect of exchangeable sodium on some soil physical properties and sodic soil reclamation. J. Indian. Soc. Soil Sci., 26(3): 243-253.
Starovoitov, V. I. and Starovoitov, M. V. 1998. Local application of organic fertilizer when planting. Kartofel’ i Ovoshchi, 2: 11-12.