Prosthetic Rehabilitation of a Patient with Congenitally Malformed Toes: Case Report

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Rajesh Bansal
     Faculty of Dental Sciences, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005 ,IN
  • Anil Kumar
     Faculty of Visual Arts, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005 ,IN
  • Mridula Sinha
     Faculty of Visual Arts, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005 ,IN

Keywords:

Toe, Prosthesis, Rehabilitation
Dental Surgery

Abstract

The aim of this article is to present a case with malformed toes which was rehabilitated by toe prosthesis. A 24-year-old female was suffering with problem of malformed toes due to which she was facing problems in her family as people used to point out the malformation and insisted to get it rectified because they believed that it will bring bad luck to them. Surgical reconstruction would have been a better option but the patient was not ready to undergo multiple surgeries, and poor economy was also a limitation; hence, prosthesis was planned for this case. In this case, conventional wax elimination technique was used to fabricate a poly-methyl-meth-acrylate (PMMA) toe prosthesis for a female patient to improve esthetics and better marital life.

Downloads

Published

2018-05-09

How to Cite

Bansal, R., Kumar, A., & Sinha, M. (2018). Prosthetic Rehabilitation of a Patient with Congenitally Malformed Toes: Case Report. Journal of Pierre Fauchard Academy (India Section), 30(2), 36–39. Retrieved from https://informaticsjournals.co.in/index.php/jpfa/article/view/21086

Issue

Volume 30, Issue 2, June 2016

Section

Case Report

License

All the articles published in JPFA are distributed under a creative commons license. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright of their work (all usages allowed except for commercial purpose).

 

References

Kini AY, Byakod PP, Angadi GS, Pai U, Bhandari AJ. Comprehensive prosthetic rehabilitation of a patient with partial finger amputations using silicone biomaterial: a technical note. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2010;34:488–494.

Aydin C, Karakoca S, Yilmaz H. Implant retained digital prosthesis with custom designed attachments: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;97:191–195.

Suresh Babu M, Gopinath A, Sandeep C, Sreedevi B, Krishna K, Sanjay DM. An innovative technique for fabrication of finger prosthesis – a case report. J Orofac Sci. 2011;3:15–16.

Michael JW, Buckner H. Options for finger prosthesis. J Prosthet Orthot. 1994;6:10–19.

Ozturk S, Sengezer M, Zor F. Reconstruction of acquired partial auricular defects by porous polyethylene implant and superficial temporoparietal fascia flap in adult patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:1349–1357.

Shanmuganathan N, Maheswari MU, Anandkumar V, Padmanabhan TV, Swarup S, Jibran AH. Aesthetic finger prosthesis. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2011;11:232–237.

Visser A, Raghoebar GM, Van Oort RP, Vissink A. Fate of implant retained craniofacial prosthesis: lifespan and aftercare. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:89–98.

Madhan R, Sanjana N. Prosthetic management of a patient with Treacher Collins Syndrome. Indian J Dent Res. 2006;17:78–81.

Beumer J, Curtis TA, Firtell DN. Maxillofacial Rehabilitation, Prosthodontic and Surgical Considerations. 1st ed. 1996;320–340.

Kumar KR, Vanitha R, Thulasingam C, Nasser KSG, Kumar S, Sunitha P. Chemical interaction of stains on polymethylmethacrylate used for maxillofacial prosthesis: a spectroscopic analysis. J Prosthodont Soc. 2008;8:144–147.