Cone-beam Computerized Tomography Evaluation of Canine Retraction Using Micro Implant and Conventional Anchorage

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Girish Chaudhary
     Department of Orthodontics, Baba Jaswant Singh Dental College, Hospital & Research Institute, Chandigarh Road, Ludhiana 141010 ,IN
  • Maninder S. Sidhu
     Department of Orthodontics, SGT Dental College, Hospital and Research Institute, Budhera, Gurgaon 122505, Haryana ,IN
  • Seema Grover
     Department of Orthodontics, SGT Dental College, Hospital and Research Institute, Budhera, Gurgaon 122505, Haryana ,IN
  • Anshul Chaudhry
     Department of Orthodontics, Christian Dental College, Hospital & Research Institute, Brown Road, Ludhiana 141010, Punjab ,IN

Keywords:

CBCT, Coil Spring, Maxillary Canine
Orthodontics

Abstract

Objective: Various anchorage techniques have been designed for canine retraction. The aim was to measure and compare the rate of canine retraction with conventional method and micro implant using CBCT.

Materials and methods: Sample size comprising of 17 subjects were scheduled for extraction of all first premolars. After leveling and aligning, titanium micro implants were placed between the roots of the second premolar and the first molars on right side, in both the arches. Pre and post retraction CBCT scans were taken. Retraction was done using sliding mechanics using stainless steel arch wire.

Results: The maxillary right canine (micro implant) retracted by 6.75 mm and tipped distally by 9.51° at a rate of 1.05 mm/month while the mandibular right canine retracted by 4.83 mm and tipped distally by 7.88° at a rate of 1.13 mm/month. On the left side (conventional) with molar as a source of anchorage, maxillary canine retracted by 6.03 mm and tipped distally by 6.51° at a rate of 1.46 mm/month while the mandibular canine retracted by 5.03 mm and tipped distally by 4.34° at a rate of 1.15 mm/month.

Conclusion: Implants can serve as a source of anchorage.

Downloads

Published

2018-09-12

How to Cite

Chaudhary, G., Sidhu, M. S., Grover, S., & Chaudhry, A. (2018). Cone-beam Computerized Tomography Evaluation of Canine Retraction Using Micro Implant and Conventional Anchorage. Journal of Pierre Fauchard Academy (India Section), 28(2), 35–42. Retrieved from https://informaticsjournals.co.in/index.php/jpfa/article/view/22233

Issue

Volume 28, issue 2, June 2014

Section

Original Articles

License

All the articles published in JPFA are distributed under a creative commons license. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright of their work (all usages allowed except for commercial purpose).

 

References

Clemmer EJ, Hayes EW. Patient cooperation in wearing headgear. Am J Orthod. 1979;75:517-524.

Samuels RH, Willner F, Knox J, Jones ML. A national survey of orthodontic facebow injuries in the UK and Eire. Br J Orthod. 1996;23:11-20.

Holland GN, Wallace DA, Mondino BJ, Cole SH, Ryan SJ. Severe ocular injuries from orthodontic headgear. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103:649-651.

Dickson G. Contact dermatitis and cervical headgear. Br Dent J. 1983;155:112.

Kanomi R. Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 1997;31:763-767.

Ohmae M, Saito S, Morohashi T, et al. A clinical and histological evaluation of titanium mini implants as anchors for orthodontic intrusion in the beagle dog. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;119:489-497.

Kyung HM, Park HS, Bae SM, Sung JH, Kim IB. Development of orthodontic micro-implants for intraoral anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 2003;37:321-328.

Fritz U, Ehmer A, Diedrich P. Clinical suitability of titanium microscrews for orthodontic anchorage-preliminary experiences. J Orofac Orthop. 2004;65:410-418.

Kojima Y, Fukui H. Numerical simulation of canine retraction by sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127:542-551.

Kim SH, Choi YS, Hwang EH, Chung KR, Kook YA, Nelson G. Surgical positioning of orthodontic mini-implants with guides fabricated on models replicated with cone beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131:82-89.

Chen J, Li S, Fang S. Quantification of tooth displacement from cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:393-400.

Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am. 2008;52:707-730.

Ziegler P, Ingervall B. A clinical study of maxillary canine retraction with a retraction spring and with sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;95:99-106.

Ricketts RM, Bench RW, Hilgers JJ, Schulhof R. An overview of computerized cephalometrics. Am J Orthod. 1972;61:1-28.

Ricketts RM. The value of cephalometrics and computerized technology. Angle Orthod. 1972;42:179-199.

Paulson RC, Speidel TM, Isaacson RJ. A laminographic study of cuspid retraction versus molar anchorage loss. Angle Orthod. 1970;40:20-27.

Sonis AL, Van der Plas E, Gianelly A. A comparison of elastomeric auxiliaries versus elastic thread on premolar extraction site closure: an in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1986;89:73-78.

Dixon V, Read MJ, O'Brien KD, Worthington HV, Mandall NA. A randomized clinical trial to compare three methods of orthodontic space closure. J Orthod. 2002;29:31-36.

Darendeliler MA, Darendeliler H, Uner O. The drum spring (DS) retractor: constant and continuous force for canine retraction. Eur J Orthod. 1997;19:115-130.

Sleichter CG. A clinical assessment of light and heavy forces in the closure of extraction spaces. Angle Orthod. 1971;41:66e75.

Yao CC, Lee JJ, Chen HY, Chang ZC, Chang HF, Chen YJ. Maxillary molar intrusion with fixed appliances and mini implant anchorage studied in three dimensions. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:754-760.

Hamada Y, Kondoh T, Noguchi K, et al. Application of limited cone beam computed tomography to clinical assessment of alveolar bone grafting: a preliminary report. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005;42:128-137.

Scarfe WC. Imaging of maxillofacial trauma: evolutions and emerging revolutions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;100:S75-S96.

Huang J, Buman A, Mah J. The cutting edge: threedimensional radiographic analysis in orthodontics. J Clin Orthod. 2005;39:421-428.

Thiruvenkatachari B, Ammayappan P, Kandaswamy R. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134:30-35.

Daskalogiannakis J, McLachlan KR. Canine retraction with rare earth magnets: an investigation into the validity of the constant force hypothesis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;109:489-495.

Owmann-Moll P, Kurol J, Lundgren D. Continuous versus interrupted continuous orthodontic force related to early tooth movement and root resorption. Angle Orthod. 1995;65:395-402.

Huffman DJ, Way DC. A clinical evaluation of tooth movement along arch wires of two different sizes. Am J Orthod. 1983;83:453-459.

Rajcich MM, Sadowsky C. Efficacy of intra-arch mechanics using differential moments for achieving anchorage control in extraction cases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:441-448.