Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Different Bonding Agents on the Ultramorphology of Primary Tooth Dentin
Jump To References Section
Pedodontics
Keywords:
Ultramorphology, Primary teeth dentin, SEM, Bonding agentsAbstract
The composition of dentin is different in primary and permanent teeth but the same bonding protocol has been advocated for both. Very few studies are available for primary teeth regarding the current bonding agents. The aim of the study was to analyse and compare the changes in the ultramorphology of dentin in primary teeth using different bonding agents. 18 extracted human deciduous teeth were collected. Occlusal surfaces of all the teeth were grounded to expose the dentin and were divided into four groups: (a) for viewing dentinal morphology (3 teeth), (b) with Scotchbond multipurpose (5 teeth), (c) with Adhe SE (5 teeth), (d) with Futurabond NR (5 teeth). The bonding agents were applied to each group following the manufacturer's instruction and samples wert>. prepared for viewing under Scanning Electronic Microscope. Scotchbond Multipurpose was able to completely remove the smear layer from the dentinal surface. While the other two groups i.e Futurabond NR and Adhe SE were not able to completely remove the smearlayer. The etch and rinse approach helps in the complete removal of smear layer and opening of dentinal tubules. This may be responsible for better penetration of adhesive monomers.Downloads
Published
2018-12-11
How to Cite
Mousumi, G., Seema, C., Naveen, M., & Pallavi, V. (2018). Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Different Bonding Agents on the Ultramorphology of Primary Tooth Dentin. Journal of Pierre Fauchard Academy (India Section), 25(1), 27–32. Retrieved from https://informaticsjournals.co.in/index.php/jpfa/article/view/22973
Issue
Section
Original Articles
License
All the articles published in JPFA are distributed under a creative commons license. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright of their work (all usages allowed except for commercial purpose).