Prevalence of Mandibular Fractures in a Government Medical College at Ranchi

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Virendra K. Prajapati
     Professor and Head, Department of Dentistry, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi – 834009, Jharkhand ,IN
  • Harsh Priya
     Associate Professor, Department of Public Health Dentistry, Centre for Dental Education and Research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi – 110029, Delhi ,IN
  • Anuj Sharma
     Ex Senior Resident, Department of Dentistry, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi – 834009, Jharkhand ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/jpfa/2019/23506

Keywords:

Behaviour, Children, Dental Caries, Prevalence, Socioeconomic Status
Dentistry

Abstract

Context: The unique position, shape and structure of the lower jaw lead to its high incidence of fracture. The mandible is a membranous long bone bent to a horse shoe shape. Even though it is very strong, its prominent position on the face makes it vulnerable to fracture. The fracture can occur in different parts of the bone, sometimes at multiple sites too, depending upon the nature of the impact. Aim and Setting and Design: The purpose of this study is to determine the etiology, pattern and distribution of mandibular fractures in a Government Medical College at Ranchi, Jharkhand. Methods and Materials: The study was carried out in the dental OPD of a Government Medical College at Ranchi, Jharkhand from June 2013 to November 2014. All patients who were clinically and radio graphically confirmed fracture mandible were examined and all demographic variables (age, gender, place, education, occupation, tobacco habit and duration of habit) were recorded. The pattern and cause of mandibular fracture were included and sites were classified accordingly as ramus, condyle, symphysis, body, parasymphysis and angle. Statistical Analysis: Simple descriptive statistics were employed for the analysis. Results and Conclusion: The present study concluded Road Traffic Accidents as the most common cause for mandibular fractures. Also, parasymphyseal fracture was the commonest unilateral and parasymphysis and condyle as commonest combined fracture of the mandible..

Downloads

Published

2019-11-28

How to Cite

K. Prajapati, V., Priya, H., & Sharma, A. (2019). Prevalence of Mandibular Fractures in a Government Medical College at Ranchi. Journal of Pierre Fauchard Academy (India Section), 33(3), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.18311/jpfa/2019/23506

Issue

Volume 33, Issue 3, September 2019

Section

Original Articles

License

All the articles published in JPFA are distributed under a creative commons license. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright of their work (all usages allowed except for commercial purpose).

 

References

Mittal G, Mittal S. Mandibular fractures at veer chandrasinghgarhwali government medical science and research institute, Garhwal region, Uttarakhand, India: A retrospective study. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2013; 3(2):161–165. https://doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.113654. PMid:23919182. PMCid:PMC3728855

Kar IB, Mahavoi BR. Retrospective analysis of 503 maxillo facial trauma cases in Odisha during the period of Dec'04Nov'09. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2012; 11(2):177–181. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s12663-011-0276-z. PMid:23730065. PMCid:PMC3386404

Van Hoof RF, Merkx CA, Stekelenbrug EC. The different patterns of fractures of the facial skeleton in four European countries. Int J Oral Surg. 1977; 6: 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(77)80066-5

Brook IM, Wood N. Aetiology and incidence of facial fractures in adults. Int J Oral Surg. 1983; 12:293–298. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(83)80016-7

Krishnaraj S, Chinnaswamy R. A 4-year retrospective study of mandibular fractures in a South Indian city. J Craniofac Surg. 2007; 18: 776–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0b013e318069005d. PMid:17667664

Ellis E 3rd, Moos KF, el- Attar A. Ten years of mandibular fractures: An analysis of 2,137 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1985; 59:120-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/00304220(85)90002-7

Sojot AJ, Meisami T, Sandor GK, Clokie CM. The epidem ology of mandibular fractures treated at the Toronto general hospital: A review of 246 cases. J Can Dent Assoc. 2001; 67(11):640–644.

Venugopal MG, Sinha R, Menon PS, Chattopadhyay PK, Chowdhury SKR. Fractures in the maxillofacial region: A four year retrospective study. MJAFI. 2010; 66(1):14–17.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-1237(10)80084-X

Tamgadge PB, Kalbande A. Prevalence of mandibular fractures in Yavatmal District (M.S.) Int J of Scientific Res. 2013; 2(3). https://doi.org/10.15373/22778179/MAY2013/162

Fontana M, Jackson R, Eckert G, Swigonski N, Chin J, Zandona AF, Ando M, Stookey GK, Down S, Zero DT. Identification of caries risk factors in toddlers. J Dent Res. 2011; 90:209–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510385458. PMid:21173434. PMCid:PMC3144099

Levin KA, Davies CA, Douglas CV, Pitts NB. Urban rural differences in dental caries of 5-year old children in Scotland. Soc Sci Med. 2010; 71:2020–2027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.006. PMid:20965633

Priya H, Acharya S, Kumar M, Bhat M, Purohit B. Oral health status and treatment need among preschool children attending Anganwadi centres - A comparative study. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2012; 10(4):355–63.

Thapliyal GK, Sinha R, Menon PS, Chakranarayan A. Management of mandibular fractures. MJAFI. 2008; 64:218– 220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-1237(08)80096-2

Natu SS, Pradhan H, Gupta H, et al. An epidemiological study on pattern and incidence of mandibular fractures. Plast Sur. Int.; 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/834364. PMid:23227327. PMCid:PMC3503282.

Kamath RA, Bharani S, Hammannavar R, Ingle SP, Shah AG. Maxillofacial trauma in central karnataka, India: An outcome of 95 cases in a regional trauma care centre. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2012; 5(4):197–204. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1322536. PMid:24294402. PMCid:PMC3577602

Fridrich KL, Pena - Velasco G, Olson RA. Changingtrends with Mandibular fractures: A review of 1,067 cases.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992; 50:586–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(92)90438-6.