Life, Thoughts and Percepts - Need for a Feminine Conscience

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • ,IN

Keywords:

No Keywords.

Abstract

Feminism has its source in the inconsequence of inequalities, discriminations, atrocities and problems confronting woman dignity all over the world. Many incompatible, incomprehensive doctrines adopted a universal notion of womanhood subject to prevailing traditional norms preventing a decent quality of life and expressing power of capabilities. Feminist theories perpetuated to assess the compatible goals and aspirations of women for gender parity and elimination of male monopoly. Moreover, the recognition of a highly inclusive notion of personhood necessitated the thinking on social relatedness and communicative interactions. The struggle for equal privileges out of her conscious awakening to the demand that 'all human beings have a capacity to perceive, imagine, think and to live to the normal end of life, its capacity for relatedness with society and environment to articulate the conception of good and have a dignified life' provides a normative standard for moral and intellectual development. Theorists have been arguing against deprivation of capabilities and fighting for eqxxal participation. But the potential in question is that they are not concerned with the ways to provide a strong basis for family and social status that articulates non-coercive aesthetic order which is the foundation of a stronger nation.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-14

How to Cite

Usha Devi, N. (2024). Life, Thoughts and Percepts - Need for a Feminine Conscience. Sadvidya Journal of Research in Sanskrit, 4(1), 7–25. Retrieved from https://informaticsjournals.co.in/index.php/sadvidyasanskrit/article/view/46342

Issue

Section

Articles

 

References

Groundwork. I.Kant.p.81,417-18/46.

Habermass. Jurgen. 1987. life world and system. A Critique of Functionalist Reason, vol.2.

1993. Justification and Application. Remarks on Discourse Et ics. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.

Zizek.S. For They Know Not what they do Enjoyment as a Political Factor. London 1991. p. 496.

Richard J. Bernstein. Habermass and Modernity etc. Intro. P.10.

Habermass. What is Universal Pragmatism? In Communication and the Evaluation of the Society. Boston. 1974.p.2.

Rgveda.V.28, X.39, VIII.80.

Ibid. X.8,10.

Aristotel.68.

Yajnavalkyasmrti.2.4.5., Sarvasya kamaya sarvam priyam bhavati. Brhadaranyakopanisad.

S.Radhakrishnan. Religion and Society. 1947.

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.