Effect of Activating Flux on Penetration in ATIG Welding of 316 Stainless Steel
Authors
-
Mechanical Engineering Department, Kalyani Govt. Engineering College, Kalyani, West Bengal ,IN
Sagar Roy -
Mechanical Engineering Department, Kalyani Govt. Engineering College, Kalyani, West Bengal ,INSiladitya Samaddar
-
Mechanical Engineering Department, Kalyani Govt. Engineering College, Kalyani, West Bengal ,INMd. Nasim Uddin
-
Mechanical Engineering Department, Kalyani Govt. Engineering College, Kalyani, West Bengal ,INAktarul Hoque
-
Mechanical Engineering Department, Kalyani Govt. Engineering College, Kalyani, West Bengal ,INSagnik Mishra
-
Mechanical Engineering Department, Kalyani Govt. Engineering College, Kalyani, West Bengal ,INSantanu Das
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22486/iwj/2017/v50/i4/162275Keywords:
Welding, GTAW, ATIG Welding, Activating Flux, Bead-on-Plate Welding, Bead Geometry, Penetration.Abstract
Tungsten inert gas welding is popular in some industries due to the possibility of obtaining good weld bead surface and high-quality joint without any weld defect. However, compared to many welding processes, shallow penetration of TIG welding hinders its applicability to weld thick components in one pass, thus the productivity is relatively low. An increased depth of penetration can be achieved by Activated TIG (ATIG) welding leading to overall reduction in number of welding passes, and thus increasing productivity. In the present work, attempts were made to find out the optimum flux mixture of SiO and TiO from various ratio of mixtures by carrying out 2 2 bead-on-plate welding on AISI 316 Stainless Steel specimens. From the obtained experimental data, suitable flux ratio was tried to find out giving the highest depth of penetration.
References
Sakthivel T, Vasudevan M, Laha K, Parameswaran P, Chandravathi KS, Mathew MD and Bhaduri AK (2011); Comparison of creep rupture behaviour of type 316L(N) austenitic stainless steel joints welded by TIG and activated TIG welding processes, Materials Science and Engineering A, 528, pp.6971– 6980.
Tseng KH and Hsu CY (2011); Performance of activated TIG process in austenitic stainless steel welds, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 211, pp.503–512.
Kumar V, Lucas B, Howse D, Raghunathan S and Vilarinho L (2015); Investigation of the A-TIG Mechanism and Productivity Benefits in TIG Welding, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on the Joining of Materials.
Patel AB and Patel SP (2014); The effect of activating flux in TIG welding. International Journal of Computational Engineering Research, 4, pp.65-70.
Vyas AH and Patel RM (2017); A review paper on TIG welding process parameters, International Journal for Scientific Research & Development, 5, pp.1301-1304.
Yang C, Lin S, Liu F, Wu L and Zhang Q (2003); Research on the mechanism of penetration increase by flux in ATIG welding, Journal of Material Science and Technology, 19(Suppl.1), pp.225-227.
Chern TS, Tseng KH and Tsai HL (2011); Study of the characteristics of duplex stainless steel activated tungsten inert gas welds, Materials and Design, 32, pp.255–263.
Yang C, Lin S, Liu F, Wu L and Zhang Q (2003); Research on the mechanism of penetration increase by flux in ATIG welding, Journal of Material Science and Technology, 19(Suppl.1), pp.225-227.
Huang HY, Shyu SW, Tseng KH and Chou CP (2005); Evaluation of TIG flux welding on the characteristics of stainless steel, Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, 10, pp.566-573.
Ahmadi E, Ebrahimi AR and Azari Khosroshahi R (2013); Welding of 304L stainless steel with activated tungsten inert gas process (A-TIG), International Journal of ISSI, 10(1), pp.27-33.
Ming LQ, Hong WX, Da ZZ and Jun W (2007); Effect of activating flux on arc shape and arc voltage in tungsten inert gas welding, Transactions of the Nonferrous Metallurgy Society of China, I7, pp.486-490.
Singh EB and Singh EA (2015); Performance of activated TIG process in mild steel welds, IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, 12, pp.1-5.
Sandor T, Mekler C, Dobranszky J and Kaptay G (2013); An improved theoretical model for A-TIG welding based on surface phase transition and reversed Marangoni flow, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions, 44A, pp.351361.
Lugade PS and Deshmukh MJ (2015); Optimization of process parameters of activated tungsten inert gas (ATIG) welding for stainless steel 304L using Taguchi method, International Journal of Engineering Research and General Science, 3(3), pp.854-860.
Kumar R and Sundara Bharathi SR (2015); A review study on A-TIG welding of 316(L) austenitic stainless steel, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Science and Technology, 2, pp.2066-2072.
Marya M (2002); Theoretical and experimental assessment of chloride effects in the A-TIG welding of magnesium, Welding in the World, 46, pp.7-21.
Zhang RH, Pan JL and Katayama S (2011); The mechanism of penetration increase in A-TIG welding, Frontiers of Material Science, 5, pp.109-118.
Sándor T and Dobránszky J. (2007); The experiences of activated tungsten inert gas (ATIG) welding applied on 1.4301 type stainless steel plates, Materials Science Forum, 537-538, pp.63-70.
Fujii, Sato T, Lua S and Nogi K (2008); Development of an advanced A-TIG (AA-TIG) welding method by control of Marangoni convection, Materials Science and Engineering A, 495, pp.296-303.
Shah B and Madhvani B (2017); A review paper on A-TIG welding process, International Journal of Science Technology & Engineering, 3, pp.312-315.
Magudeeswaran G, Nair SR, Sundar L and Harikannan N (2014); Optimization of process parameters of the A-TIG welding for aspect ratio of UNS S32205 duplex stainless steel welds. Defense Technology, 10, pp.251-260.
Vasantharaja P and Vasudevan M (2012); Studies on ATIG welding of low activation ferritic / martensitic steel, Journal of Nuclear Materials, 421, pp.117-123.
Pramanick AK, Modak S and Pal TK (2013); Effect of different oxide fluxes on the penetration depth, microstructure and corrosion behaviour of austenitic stainless steel in A-TIG welding, Indian Welding Journal, 46(1), pp.40-49.
