Influence of Current Pulsing on Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of Tungsten Inert Gas (TIG) Welded AISI 304L Austenite Stainless Steel Joints
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22486/iwj/2019/v52/i4/186788Keywords:
Tungsten Inert Gas, Austenitic Stainless Steel, Interpulse TIG Welding, Tensile Properties, Microstructure.Abstract
The Austenitic Stainless Steels (ASS) are probably the most widely used materials in stainless steels, category AISI 304L is an important grade of the ASS, which is commonly used in many of important industries such as containers of transporting chemicals, oil refinery, nuclear reactor tanks, dairy industries, and textile industries. Currently, 304L Austenitic stainless steel sheets are used as fuel tanks in Armour Fighting Vehicle (AFV). These tanks are fabricated by conventional Tungsten Inert Gas (TIG) welding process. In conventional welding, fusion zones typically exhibit coarse columnar grains because of the prevailing thermal conditions during weld metal solidification. This often results in inferior weld mechanical properties. Interpulse Tungsten Inert Gas (IPTIG) welding is a new variant of conventional Tungsten Inert Gas (TIG) welding process. This process offers many advantages over conventional TIG welding process such as narrow heat affected zone, deeper penetration compared to Constant Current TIG (CCTIG) and Pulsed Current TIG (PCTIG) welding processes. The present investigation was carried out to understand the effect of arc pulsing technique on cross sectional weld bead profile, micro hardness, microstructure and the tensile properties of welded joints. It is found that IPTIG welded joints showed superior mechanical properties compared to CCTIG and PCTIG joints, and this is mainly due to formation of finer grains in the fusion zone, caused by the combined effect of arc constriction and pulsating action.
References
Viswanathan R and Bakker W (2001); Materials for ultra supercritical coal power plants - boiler materials: part 1, J Mater Eng Perform, 10, pp.81-95.
Baddoo NR (2008); Stainless steel in construction - a review of research, applications, challenges and opportunities. J of Constructional Steel Research, 64, pp. 1199-06.
Lippold JC and Koteki DJ (2005); Welding Metallurgy and Weldability of Stainless steels 2nd ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Giridharan PK and Murugan N (2009); Optimization of pulsed GTA welding process parameters for the welding of AISI 304L stainless steel sheets. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 40, pp. 478–489.
Karunakaran N (2012); Effect of pulsed current on temperature distribution, weld profiles and characteristics of GTA welded stainless steel joints. Int J Engineering and Technology, 2, pp.1908-1916.
Martin L (2014); The Avesta welding manual-practice and products for stainless steel welding. Avesta welding AB, Sweden. www.kskct.cz/images/materialy/en/avesta/.pdf
Yousefieh M, Shamanian M and Saatchi A (2011); Influence of heat input in pulsed current GTAW process on microstructure and corrosion resistance of duplex stainless steel welds. J. Iron and Steel Research International, 18(9), pp.65-69.
Kou S and Le Y (1986); Nucleation mechanism and grain refining of weld metal. Welding Journal, 65, pp. 305-313.
Farahani F, Shamanian F and Ashrafizadeh A (2012); Comparative study on direct and pulsed current gas tungsten arc welding of Alloy 617. AMAE Int J Manufacturing and Material Science, 02 (01), pp.1-6.
Yousefieh M, Shamanian M and Arghavan AR (2012); Analysis of design of experiments methodology for optimization of pulsed current GTAW process parameters for ultimate tensile strength of UNS S32760 welds. Metallogr Microstruct Anal, 1, pp. 85–91.
Balasubramanian M, Jayabalan V and Balasubramanian V (2010); Effect of process parameters of pulsed current tungsten inert gas welding on weld pool geometry of titanium welds. Acta Metallurgica. Sinica. (English Letters), 23(4), pp.312-320.