Work Engagement of Teachers Issues and Challenges: A Review
Authors
-
Krupanidhi College of Management, Bangalore - 560034, Karnataka ,IN
Varsha V. Menon -
Krupanidhi College of Management, Bangalore - 560034, Karnataka ,INS. S. Devika
-
Krupanidhi College of Management, Bangalore - 560034, Karnataka ,INMeghana Manoharan
-
Department of Management, Krupanidhi Degree College, Bangalore - 560034, Karnataka, ,INNajassim Pasha
-
Krupanidhi College of Management, Bangalore - 560034, Karnataka ,INN. Rajkumar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18311/jeoh/2023/34106Keywords:
National Education Policy, Teachers, Work Engagement, WorkplaceAbstract
As the emphasis on quality in the school system grows, the teaching profession is undergoing profound changes. There are several methods to characterize leadership styles within an organization, with creativity, innovation, continuous development, and change management being among the most prevalent; in today’s classrooms, this expression is gaining popularity. For these reasons, educators’ work lives are more laden with worry and uncertainty. There are still techniques to evaluate a teacher’s performance despite these obstacles. A career that was previously demanding has become even more so as a result of this abrupt change. As quality indicators, they are put in a situation where they must choose between employing tried-and-true teaching strategies or putting the needs of their pupils first. It is logical that under NEP 2020, there will be a greater level of teacher participation. This study examines the current context and future prognosis for teachers’ professional involvement. This literature study seeks to determine the elements that impact teachers’ commitment to their jobs and the children they teach. With a focus on quality, a setting that encourages new ideas, and the National Education Policy, 2020 being implemented, teacher work motivation must be a worry. Transitioning to a curriculum with a premium on learning is challenging and unavoidable. Therefore, it is imperative that instructors like their work. We investigate the reasons for employee commitment in a workplace and the outcomes of such commitment.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Varsha V. Menon, S. S. Devika, Meghana Manoharan, Najassim Pasha, N. Rajkumar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2023-08-17
Published 2023-09-19
References
Liu H, Zhou J, Liu H, Xin B. Is the uncertainty of gaining legitimacy from organizational change an antecedent of employees’ resistance to change? Chinese Management Studies. 2021; 15(4):769-84.
Masland JW, Radway LI. Soldiers and scholars: Military education and national policy. Princeton University Press; 2015.
Ghicajanu M, Irimie S, Marica L, Munteanu R. Criteria for business excellence. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2015; 23:445-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00388-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00388-3
Rehman SU, Elrehail H, Alsaad A, Bhatti A. Intellectual capital and innovative performance: A mediation-moderation perspective. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 2021; 23(5):998-1024. https:// doi.org/10.1108/JIC-04-2020-0109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-04-2020-0109
Kaushal V, Jaiswal D, Kant R, Ali N. Determinants of university reputation: Conceptual model and empirical investigation in an emerging higher education market. International Journal of Emerging Markets. (Ahead-of-print). 2021. https://doi. org/10.1108/IJOEM-12-2020-1494 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-12-2020-1494
McLean RS, Antony J, Dahlgaard JJ. Failure of continuous improvement initiatives in manufacturing environments: A systematic review of the evidence. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence. 2017; 28(3-4):219-37. https://doi.org/10.10 80/14783363.2015.1063414 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2015.1063414
Kurpjuweit S, Reinert D, Schmidt CG, Wagner SM. Implementing visual management for continuous improvement: Barriers, success factors, and best practices. International Journal of Production Research. 2019; 57(17):5574-88. https://doi.org/10.1 080/00207543.2018.1553315 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1553315
Education S. Government of India, Ministry of Human Resource Development; 2020.
Pierce JL, Gardner DG, Crowley C. Organization-based selfesteem and well-being: Empirical examination of a spillover effect. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 2016; 25(2):181-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2015.1028377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2015.1028377
Carter WR, Nesbit PL, Badham RJ, Parker SK, Sung LK. The effects of employee engagement and self-efficacy on job performance: A longitudinal field study. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2018; 29(17):2483-502. https:// doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1244096 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1244096
Cents-Boonstra M, Lichtwarck-Aschoff A, Denessen E, Aelterman N, Haerens L. Fostering student engagement with motivating teaching: An observation study of teacher and student behaviors. Research Papers in Education. 2021; 36(6):754-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1767184 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1767184
Sirait D. The influence of principal transformational leadership, work culture, and work environment on teacher performance in state senior high schools throughout Banjarbaru city. J Adv Educ Philos. 2021; 5(12):391-400.
Räsänen K, Pietarinen J, Pyhältö K, Soini T, Väisänen P. Why leave the teaching profession? A longitudinal approach to the prevalence and persistence of teacher turnover intentions. Social Psychology of Education. 2020; 23:837-59. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11218-020-09567-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-020-09567-x
Boonsiritomachai W, Sud-On P, Sudharatana Y. The effect of psychological ownership on organizational commitment. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences. 2022; 43(2):523-30. https://doi. org/10.34044/j.kjss.2022.43.2.34 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2022.43.2.34
Goštautaitė B, Bučiūnienė I. Work engagement during life-span: The role of interaction outside the organization and task significance. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2015; 89:109-19. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.05.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.05.001
McChesney K, Aldridge JM. What gets in the way? A new conceptual model for the trajectory from teacher professional development to impact. Professional development in education. 2021; 47(5):834-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1667 412 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1667412
Singh N, Bamel U, Vohra V. The mediating effect of meaningful work between human resource practices and innovative work behavior: A study of emerging market. Employee Relations: The International Journal. 2021; 43(2):459-78. https://doi. org/10.1108/ER-04-2020-0150 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-04-2020-0150
Li P, Taris TW, Peeters MC. Challenge and hindrance appraisals of job demands: One man’s meat, another man’s poison? Anxiety, Stress, and Coping. 2021; 33(1):31-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10 615806.2019.1673133 PMid:31578098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2019.1673133
Stewart CS. Secondary teachers’ perceptions of the effectiveness of a professional learning community (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University); 2017.
Merkulova LP, Kashina EG. Academics’ training for international communication and collaboration. Vestnik of Samara University. History, pedagogics, philology. 2020; 26(2):102-6. https://doi. org/10.18287/2542-0445-2020-26-2-102-106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-0445-2020-26-2-102-106
Mammadova–GunayHasanova I. Traditional and interactive teaching methods – advantages and disadvantages: Comparative analysis. Azerbaijan Journal of Educational Studies. 2019; 229(229):19-28. https://doi.org/10.29228/edu.76 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29228/edu.76
Thien LM, Chan SY. One-size-fits-all? A cross-validation study of distributed leadership and teacher academic optimism. Educational Management Administration and Leadership. 2022; 50(1):43-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220926506 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220926506
Ma Y, Bennett D. The relationship between higher education students’ perceived employability, academic engagement and stress among students in China. Education+ Training. 2021; 63(5):744- 62. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-07-2020-0219 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-07-2020-0219
Han J, Yin H, Wang J, Bai Y. Challenge job demands and job resources to university teacher well-being: The mediation of teacher efficacy. Studies in Higher Education. 2020; 45(8):1771- 85. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1594180 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1594180
Sittar K, Afrid T, Munawar S, Raoof R. Relationship between organizational commitments and job performance of university teachers. Ilkogretim Online. 2021; 20(5).
Hadidi R, Power D. (2019). Management Information Systems (MIS) curricula development, management, and deliverypossible sharing economy solutions. Journal of the Midwest Association for Information Systems (JMWAIS). 2021; 2019(1):1.
Wang LY. Levelling up academically low-performing students in student-centric education in Singapore: Global trend, local policies and future directions. Educational Review. 2021; 73(3):374-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1642304 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1642304
Shuiyun L, editors. External higher education quality assurance in China. Routledge; 2019. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315122403 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315122403
Žnidaršič J, Marič M. Relationships between work-family balance, job satisfaction, life satisfaction and work engagement among higher education lecturers. Organizacija. 2021; 54(3):227- DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2021-0015
https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2021-0015 30. Nagpal P, Kumar A, Ravindra HV. Employee engagement– impact of demographic variables in Indian IT sector. Purakala. 2020; 31(32):136-42.
Peechapol C, Na-Songkhla J, Sujiva S, Luangsodsai A. An exploration of factors influencing self-efficacy in online learning: A systematic review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning. 2018; 13(9):64. https://doi. org/10.3991/ijet.v13i09.8351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i09.8351
Kumar V, Arora D. Student engagement: A study of Ramanujan college. Ramanujan International Journal of Business and Research. 2017; 2:1-20. https://doi.org/10.51245/rijbr. v2i1.2017.136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51245/rijbr.v2i1.2017.136
Gupta A. Focus on quality in higher education in India. Indian Journal of Public Administration. 2021; 67(1):54-70. https://doi. org/10.1177/00195561211007224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00195561211007224
Sebki W. Education and economic growth in developing countries: Empirical evidence from GMM estimators for dynamic panel data. Economics and Business. 2021; 35(1):14-29. https:// doi.org/10.2478/eb-2021-0002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eb-2021-0002
Goyal A, Gupta S, Chauhan AK. Prioritizing the factors determining the quality in higher educational institutions- An application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Public Affairs. 2022; 22(4):e2647. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2647 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2647
Recuero LH, Olaberría E. Public spending in education and student’s performance in Colombia. OECD Economics Department Working Papers. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2018;
Shah M, Grebennikov L, Nair CS. A decade of study on employer feedback on the quality of university graduates. Quality Assurance in Education. 2015; 23(3):262-78. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE- 04-2014-0018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-04-2014-0018
Hasrati M. Putting the employment status of faculty into the quality of education: A Canadian case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 2022; 59(6):658-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1948887 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1948887
Li M, Yang F, Akhtar MW. Responsible leadership effect on career success: The role of work engagement and self enhancement motives in the education sector. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022; 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.888386 PMid:35572235 PMCid:PMC9094063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.888386
Van der Walt F. Workplace spirituality, work engagement and thriving at work. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology. 2018; 44(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v44i0.1457 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v44i0.1457
Jha N, Sareen P, Potnuru RKG. Employee engagement for millennials: Considering technology as an enabler. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal. 2019; 33(1):9-11. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLO-05-2018-0057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/DLO-05-2018-0057
Nikhil S, Arthi J. Perceived organisational support and work engagement: Mediation of psychological capital- A research agenda. Journal of Strategic Human Resource Management (JSHRM). 2018; 7(1).
Dang UV, Ta TTH. Higher education accreditation and university autonomy. VNU Journal of Science: Education Research. 2018; 35(1).
Aithal PS, Aithal S. Analysis of the Indian National Education Policy 2020 towards achieving its objectives. International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences (IJMTS). 2020; 5(2):19-41. https://doi.org/10.47992/IJMTS.2581.6012.0102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47992/IJMTS.2581.6012.0102
Aithal PS, Kumar PM. Challenges and opportunities for research and publications in higher education. International Journal of Scientific Research and Modern Education (IJSRME). 2017; 2455-5630.
Mendon S, Aithal PS. Quantitative ABCD analysis of organic food product and its impact on purchase intention. International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences (IJMTS). 2022; 7(1):254-78. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4136661 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47992/IJMTS.2581.6012.0190
Aithal PS, Aithal S. A modern leadership theory based on Attitude-Behaviour (AB) framework. In Proceedings of National Conference on Research in Higher Education, Learning and Administration. 2019; 1(1):61-71.
Kulkarni A. India’s higher educator sector: Challenges and opportunities. International Review of Business and Economics. 2018; 2(1):8. https://doi.org/10.56902/IRBE.2018.2.1.8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56902/IRBE.2018.2.1.8
