Awareness of the Importance of Lifestyle Modification on the Prevention of Gestational Complications in Preconception Care of Women
Authors
-
Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Karad - 415110, Maharashtra ,IN
Marzia Aslam Bijle -
Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Karad - 415110, Maharashtra ,ING. Varadharajulu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18311/jeoh/2024/36249Keywords:
Awareness, Foetus, Preconception Care, PregnancyAbstract
Background: Preconception care mainly depends on minimising the risks faced before conception, collecting all possible information before conception, and using all sources to improve the reproductive health of pregnant women. Preconception is a great opportunity for early determination of any health risk and to optimise the health of implicit moms and protect the unborn foetus from any type of health risk as well as birth defect. This study presents the best scientific approach method for developing preconception intervention packages under different conditions. Objective: To determine the awareness of the importance of lifestyle modification in the prevention of gestational complications during the preconception period. Methods: This study was approved by the Ethical Committee and Protocol Committee (protocol no. 600/2022-2023). The subjects of this observational study were women who are primigravidae and reside in Karad, India. Using random sampling, 93 participants who were primigravidae were included. A questionnaire was distributed to individuals within the age range of 21 to 30 years, based on preconception care, lifestyle modification, family support and precautionary measures. Results: It was found that out of 91 participants, only 4.3% had excellent knowledge, 8.6% had very good knowledge, 27.96% had good knowledge, 53.76% had fair knowledge and 5.38% had poor education regarding preconception care. Conclusion: The awareness among women regarding the importance of lifestyle modification in the prevention of gestational complications during the preconception period was significantly lower.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Marzia Aslam Bijle, G. Varadharajulu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2024-04-05
Published 2024-04-05
References
Dean SV, Lassi ZS, Imam AM, Bhutta ZA. Preconception care: Closing the gap in the continuum of care to accelerate improvements in maternal, newborn and child health. Reproductive Health, 2014; 11(S3). https://doi. org/10.1186/1742-4755-11-S3S1 PMid:25414942 PMCid: PMC4196556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-11-S3-S1
Lassi ZS, Dean SV, Mallick D, Bhutta ZA. Preconception care: Delivery strategies and packages for care. Reproductive Health, 2014; 11(S3). https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755- 11-S3-S7. PMid:25415178 PMCid: PMC4196568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-11-S3-S7
Jacob CM, Newell M, Hanson MA. Narrative review of reviews of preconception interventions to prevent an increased risk of obesity and non‐communicable diseases in children. Obesity Reviews, 2019; 20(1):5-17. https://doi. org/10.1111/obr.12769 PMid:31419048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12769
Lumley J, Donohue L. Aiming to increase birth weight: A randomised trial of prepregnancy information, advice and counselling in inner-urban Melbourne. BMC Public Health. 2006; 6(1):299. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458- 6-299. PMid:17156466 PMCid: PMC1712341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-299
Whitworth M, Dowswell T. Routine pre-pregnancy health promotion for improving pregnancy outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; (4):CD007536. https://doi. org/10.1002/14651858.CD007536 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007536
Hillemeier MM, Downs DS, Feinberg ME, Weisman CS, Chuang CH, Parrott R, Velott D, Francis LA, Baker SA, Dyer AM. Improving women’s preconceptional health findings from a randomised trial of the strong healthy women intervention in the Central Pennsylvania women’s health study. Women’s Health Issues Official Publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women’s Health. 2008; 18(6): S87-96.
Czeizel AE. Ten years of experience in periconceptional care. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 1999; 84(1):43-9. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0301-2115(98)00246-2 PMid:10413225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-2115(98)00246-2
Moos MK, Bangdiwala SI, Meibohm AR, Cefalo RC. The impact of a preconceptional health promotion program on intendedness of pregnancy. American Journal of Perinatology. 1996; 13(2):103-8. https://doi. org/10.1055/s-2007-994302 PMid:8672181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-994302
Midhet F, Becker S. Impact of community-based interventions on maternal and neonatal health indicators: Results from a community randomised trial in rural Balochistan, Pakistan. Reproductive Health. 2010; 7(1):30-4 https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-7-30 PMid:21054870 PMCid: PMC2993657. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-7-30
O’Rourke K, Howard-Grabman L, Seoane G. Impact of community organisation of women on perinatal outcomes in rural Bolivia. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública. 1998; 3(1):9-14. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1020- 49891998000100002 PMid:9503957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1020-49891998000100002
Kasim R, Draman N, Kadir AA, Muhamad R. Knowledge, attitudes and practice of preconception care among women attending maternal health clinic in Kelantan. Education in Medicine Journal. 2016; 8(4). https://doi.org/10.5959/eimj. v8i4.475 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5959/eimj.v8i4.475
Livingood WC, Brady C, Pierce K, Atrash H, Hou T, Bryant T: Impact of preconception health care: Evaluation of a social determinants focused intervention. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 2010; 14(3):382-91. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10995-009-0471-4 PMid:19662521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-009-0471-4
