Study of Biological Age and Chronological Age among Diabetes and Non-Diabetes: Case-Control Study

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Department of Community Medicine, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Karad – 415110, Maharashtra ,IN
  • Department of Community Medicine, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Karad – 415110, Maharashtra ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/jeoh/2024/43738

Keywords:

Biological Age, Chronological Age, Diabetes and Non-diabetes Participant

Abstract

Background: Age is a gradual and irreversible pathophysiological process. There are two types of ages one is Chronological Age (CA) another is Biological Age (BA). CA starts from the date of birth and biological age indicates what current physical condition of the body of those persons. Overall in India, seventy-seven million people above the age of 18 years are surviving from diabetes and out of that almost twenty-five million are pre-diabetics. Diabetes mellitus is linked with an increased risk of serious health complications which decrease health span. Our area of interest study of BA and CA among diabetes and non-diabetes participants. Aim: Comparison of biological age and chronological age in diabetes and Non-diabetes Participants. Material and Methods: A Study was conducted in a pastoral area of western Maharashtra and collected data by house-to-house survey. Biological age was precise by using a standard instrument Omron HBF-375-IN Body Composition Monitor. We studied a total of 507 subjects, those aged 18 to 84 years, individuals with any surgical illness and physically handicapped were excluded. Results: We observed that 10.6% of people were suffering from diabetes out of 507. The Mean chronological age of diabetes mellitus participants was 64.85± 10.856 and 47.7±16.17 for non-diabetes mellitus participants. The Biological age of diabetes mellitus participants was 62.75 ± 10.6 and 49.07 ± 14.94 of nondiabetes mellitus participants. The mean difference between the biological age and chronological age of diabetes mellitus participants was 2.1851±9.37 and 1.25 ±12.5477 in non-diabetes mellitus. The difference in these means was moderately significant (t= 0.43489, p=0.6645). Conclusions: The Biological age of Non-diabetes Participants is less as compared to chronological age. Diabetes Participants have more biological ages as compared to their chronological age.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Published

2024-08-29

How to Cite

Alate, M. M., & Kakade, S. V. (2024). Study of Biological Age and Chronological Age among Diabetes and Non-Diabetes: Case-Control Study. Journal of Ecophysiology and Occupational Health, 24(4), 329–334. https://doi.org/10.18311/jeoh/2024/43738

Issue

Section

Research Article
Received 2024-04-23
Accepted 2024-05-22
Published 2024-08-29

 

References

Guo J, Huang X, Dou L, Yan M, Shen T, Tang W, et al. Aging and aging-related diseases: From molecular mechanisms to interventions and treatments. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022; 7(1):391. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-02201251-0 PMid:36522308 PMCid:PMC9755275

Comfort A. Test-battery to measure ageing-rate in man. The Lancet. 1969; 294(7635):1411-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0140-6736(69)90950-7 PMid:4188291

Bahour N, Cortez B, Pan H, Shah H, Doria A, AguayoMazzucato C. Diabetes mellitus correlates with increased biological age as indicated by clinical biomarkers. Geroscience. 2022:1-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357021-00469-0 PMid:34773197 PMCid:PMC8589453

Khan MAB, Hashim MJ, King JK, Govender RD, Mustafa H, Al Kaabi J. Epidemiology of type 2 diabetes-global burden of disease and forecasted trends. J Epidemiol Glob Hea. 2020; 10(1):107-11. https://doi.org/10.2991/ jegh.k.191028.001 PMid:32175717 PMCid:PMC7310804

Alotaibi A, Perry L, Gholizadeh L, Al-Ganmi A. Incidence and prevalence rates of diabetes mellitus in Saudi Arabia: An overview. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2017; 7:211-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jegh.2017.10.001 PMid:29110860 PMCid:PMC7384574

Siddiqui AA, Siddiqui SA, Ahmad S, Siddiqui S, Ahsan I, Sahu K. Diabetes: Mechanism, pathophysiology and management-A review. Int J Drug Dev Res. 2013; 5(2):1-23.

Yaribeygi H, Farrokhi FR, Butler AE, Sahebkar A. Insulin resistance: Review of the underlying molecular mechanisms. J Cell Physiol. 2019; 234(6):8152-61. https:// doi.org/10.1002/jcp.27603 PMid:30317615

Agrawal S, Millett CJ, Dhillon PK, Subramanian SV, Ebrahim S. Type of vegetarian diet, obesity and diabetes in adult Indian population. Nutr J. 2014; 13:89. https:// doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-13-89 PMid:25192735 PMCid:PMC4168165

Chailurkit LO, Thongmung N, Vathesatogkit P, Sritara P, Ongphiphadhanakul B. Biological age as estimated by baseline circulating metabolites is associated with incident diabetes and mortality. J Nutr Health Aging. 2024:100032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnha.2023.100032 PMid:38388109

Khazaei HA, Teymuri B, Nakhaei A, Mohammadi M, Noura M, Khazaei A, et al. Evaluation of haptoglobin phenotypes in association with clinical features of patients suffered from preterm labor disease. Acta Med Iran. 2014; 52(2):106-10. PMID: 24659066.

Petrie JR, Guzik TJ, Touyz RM. Diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease: Clinical insights and vascular mechanisms. Can J Cardiol. 2018; 34(5):575-84. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2017.12.005 PMid:29459239 PMCid:PMC5953551

Lemke E, Vetter VM, Berger N, Banszerus VL, Konig M, Demuth I. Cardiovascular health is associated with the epigenetic clock in the Berlin Aging Study II (BASE-II). Mech Ageing Dev. 2022; 201:111616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2021.111616 PMid:34879249

Pottinger TD, Khan SS, Zheng Y, Zhang W, Tindle HA, Allison M, et al. Association of cardiovascular health and epigenetic age acceleration. Clin Epigenetics. 2021; 13:42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-021-01028-2 PMid:33632308 PMCid:PMC7905851

Joyce BT, Gao T, Zheng Y, Ma J, Hwang SJ, Liu L, et al. Epigenetic age acceleration reflects long-term cardiovascular health. Circ Res. 2021; 129:770-81. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318965 PMid:34428927 PMCid:PMC8484046

Nannini DR, Joyce BT, Zheng Y, Gao T, Liu L, Yoon G, et al. Epigenetic age acceleration and metabolic syndrome in the coronary artery risk development in young adults study. Clin Epigenetics. 2019; 11:160. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s13148-019-0767-1 PMid:31730017 PMCid:PMC6858654

Ammous F, Zhao W, Ratliff SM, Mosley TH, Bielak LF, Zhou X, et al. Epigenetic age acceleration is associated with cardiometabolic risk factors and clinical cardiovascular disease risk scores in African Americans Clin Epigenetics. 2021; 13:55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-021-01035-3 PMid:33726838 PMCid:PMC7962278

Kresovich JK, Lopez AMM, Garval EL, Xu Z, White AJ, Sandler DP, et al. Alcohol consumption and methylationbased measures of biological age. J Gerontol: Series A. 2021; 76:2107-11. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glab149 PMid:34038541 PMCid:PMC8599006

Kresovich JK, Park YM, Keller JA, Sandler DP, Taylor JA. Healthy eating patterns and epigenetic measures of biological age. Am J Clin Nutr. 2022; 115:171-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqab307 PMid:34637497 PMCid:PMC8754996

Kresovich JK, Garval EL, Lopez AMM, Xu Z, Niehoff NM, White AJ, et al. Associations of body composition and physical activity level with multiple measures of epigenetic age acceleration. Am J Epidemiol. 2021; 190:984-93. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaa251 PMid:33693587 PMCid:PMC8168202

Kresovich JK, Sandler DP, Taylor JA. Methylationbased biological age and hypertension prevalence and incidence. Hypertension. 2023; 80(6):1213-22. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.20796 PMid:36974720 PMCid:PMC10192055

Chen L, Yin X, Zhao Y, Chen H, Tan T, Yao P, et al. Biological ageing and the risks of all-cause and cause-specific mortality among people with diabetes: a prospective cohort study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2022; 76(9):771-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2022-219142 PMid:35738895