Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Technique for Optimal Material Selection of AA7075/SiC Composite Foam using COPRAS Technique
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2023/34005Keywords:
AA7075/SiC, Aluminium Composite Foam, CaCO3, COPRAS, Foaming Agent, MCDMAbstract
Aluminium foams have been manufactured and discovered to have a variety of uses in automotive and structural applications. However, due to their varied characteristics, it is difficult to choose an appropriate material. In this context, the selection of material for good properties is a challenging task. This study attempted to identify materials from various combinations employing the Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM) technique based on their mechanical and physical properties. Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) is a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) technique employed for evaluating the ranking order of the aluminium composite foam’s formulations based on performance measures. The composite foam with 2.5 wt.% of Calcium carbonate as foaming agent demonstrated the best combination of mechanical properties.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2023-10-26
Published 2023-11-10
References
Kalpakoglou T, Yiatros S. Metal foams : A review for mechanical properties under tensile and shear stress. Frontiers in Materials. 2022; 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fmats.2022.998673. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2022.998673
Jayasathyakawin S, Ravichandran M. Experimental investigations on effect of silicon carbide on microstructure and mechanical properties in Mg-3 wt % Al Alloy Matrix Using Powder Metallurgy. Silicon. 2022; 14:9163–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-022- 01834-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-022-01834-0
Acharya SR, Suresh PM. Fabrication and micro structural characterization of Al 7075 reinforced with various proportions of SiC. Mater Today Proc. 2022; 49(40):638– 43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.162
Singh NK, Balaguru S. Fabrication and mechanical characterization of Al ‑ Zn ‑ Cu Alloy/SiC/TiB 2 hybrid reinforced metal matrix composite using top loaded bottom pouring stir casting method. Silicon. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-023-02648-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-023-02648-4
Parveez B, Jamal NA, Anuar H, Ahmad Y, Aabid A, Baig M. Microstructure and mechanical properties of metal foams fabricated via melt foaming and powder metallurgy technique : A review. Materials. 2022; 15(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15155302 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15155302
Singh NK, Sethuraman B. Development and characterization of Aluminium AA7075 Hybrid Composite Foams (AHCFs) using SiC and TiB2 Reinforcement. Int J Met. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s40962-023-01009-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1718478/v1
Singh NK, Sethuraman B. Experimental analysis of foaming agent contents in AA7075/SiC closed cell aluminium composite foam. BT - recent advances in mechanical engineering. In: Sethuraman B, Jain P, Gupta M, editors. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2023. p. 567–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 981- 99- 2349- 6_51 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2349-6_51
Rathore RK, Singh NK, Sinha AK, Panthi K, Sharma AK. Mechanical properties of lightweight Aluminium Hybrid Composite Foams ( AHCFs ) for structural applications. Adv Mater Process Technol. 2022;8:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068X.2022.2048498
Bommana D. Effect of blowing agent CaCO3 content on the microstructure and mechanical properties of AA 5083 foam. Int J Met. 2021; 16(4):1885–901, https://doi. org/10.1007/s40962-021-00726-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-021-00726-0
Sharma R, Pradhan MK, Jain P. Optimal selection of an AA8011 reinforced nano Si3N4 composite using multi criteria decision-making method. Mater Today Proc. 2022; 56:1399–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. matpr.2021.11.439 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.439
Chauhan A, Vaish R. Magnetic material selection using multiple attribute decision making approach. Mater Des. 2012; 36:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. matdes.2011.11.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.11.021
Singh NK, Pradhan SK. Experimental and numerical investigations of pipe orbital welding process. Mater Today Proc. 2020; 27:2964–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. matpr.2020.04.902 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.902
Ren J, Ren X, Liu Y, Man Y, Toniolo S. Sustainability assessment framework for the prioritization of urban sewage treatment technologies. INC. 2020. https://doi. org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816394-8.00006-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816394-8.00006-9
Şahin M. A comprehensive analysis of weighting and multicriteria methods in the context of sustainable energy. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2021; 18(6):1591–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02922-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02922-7
Rathore RK, Singh NK, Xavier JF. Characterization of AA7075 alloy foam using calcium and magnesium carbonate as foaming agent. BT - processing and characterization of materials: Select proceedings of CPCM 2020. In: Pal S, Roy D, Sinha SK, editors. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2021. p. 289–97. https:// doi. org/10.1007/978- 981-16- 3937-1_30 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3937-1_30
Rathore RK, Singh NK, Sinha AK, Panthi SK, Sharma AK. Mechanical properties of lightweight Aluminium Hybrid Composite Foams (AHCFs) for structural applications. Adv Mater Process Technol. 2022; 8(4):4194–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068X.2022.2048498 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068X.2022.2048498
Shekhawat D, Singh A, Patnaik A. Effect of ceramic reinforcement on physical and mechanical behaviour of AL6061 metal matrix composites fabricated using stir casting technique. Int J Met. 2022; 17:2027-25. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s40962-022-00926-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-022-00926-2
Catibog JMR, Lazarte AMB, Magdaluyo ER. Materials selection methods in the design of monocoque for a fuel efficient concept vehicle. Procedia CIRP. 2019; 84:998– 1002, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.340 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.340