Assessment of Treatability Studies on Wastewater using Arka Amar, Arka Ayush, Arka Kesar, Arka Naveen Plants and Soil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2023/35433Keywords:
Arka Plants, Biological Treatment, Metals, Nutrients, WastewaterAbstract
The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a natural biological treatment unit. Red soil was used as structural support to the plants materials of four different Arka varieties in the treatment unit. The study also sought to ascertain the efficiency of the treatment facility in lowering various contaminants such as heavy metals- chromium, nickel, zinc, and nutrients like nitrate and phosphate as well as Total Suspended Solids (TSS), Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) and Chemical Oxygen Demand COD etc. Analytical results of the study demonstrated that the wastewater treatment was highly perceptible with an average efficiency of 98% for COD and 96.5% for BOD, displaying the ability of natural materials to break down organic matter in the wastewater. TSS was significantly reduced by the treatment as well, with an efficiency of 75%, while TDS and TS were showed less than 50% efficiency. In addition, 67% and 60% efficiency was observed for nitrates and phosphates respectively that are known to contribute eutrophication in aquatic ecosystem. Apart from this biological treatment unit was successful in lowering chromium metal concentration with an efficiency of up to 90%. The obtained result findings of our study, plainly signposted that the natural biological treatment of wastewater is a workable and sustainable alternative to conventional treatment. The natural biological treatment could be ideal for sparsely populated rural areas with limited access to conventional wastewater treatment facilities.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Joao PB, Dezotti MWC, Geraldo L. Nitrification of industrial and domestic saline wastewaters in moving bed biofilm reactor and sequencing batch reactor. Waste Management Bulletin. 2011; 185(1):242-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.09.024 PMid:20933327
Alper U. Improvement of energy demand forecasts using swarm intelligence: The case of Turkey with projections to 2025. Energy Policy. 2008; 36(1):1937-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.02.018
Schindler DW. Recent advances in the understanding and management of eutrophication. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2006; 51(2):356-363. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_ part_2.0356
Amit S, Rupali G. Developments in wastewater treatment methods. Desalination. 2004; 167:55-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2004.06.113
Naidoo S, Olaniran AO. Treated wastewater effluent as a source of microbial pollution of surface water resources. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014; 11(1):249-70. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110100249 PMid:24366046 PMCid:PMC3924443
Gunther F, Craun. A summary of waterborne illness transmitted through contaminated groundwater. Microbiology: Waterborne Outbreaks. 1972; 44(6):117582.
Victor AD, Amato PE, Ajit Ghorpade, Carl Singer, David SL,Christopher CL. The Role of treatability studies in industrial wastewater treatment. Industrial Water Quality. 2007. https://doi.org/10.2175/193864707787781250
Ferronato N, Torretta V. Waste mismanagement in developing countries: a review of global issues. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16(6):1060. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16061060 PMid:30909625 PMCid:PMC6466021
Saikat M, Arka JC. Impact of heavy metals on the environment and human health: Novel therapeutic insights to counter the toxicity. Journal of King Saud University. 2022; 34(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2022.101865
Wahied K, Balwan, Sachdeep K. Wetland-an ecological boon for the environment. East African Scholars Journal of Agriculture and Life Sciences. 2021; 4(3):38-48. https://doi.org/10.36349/easjals.2021.v04i03.001