Suitability Study on Strength Properties of Crumb Rubber in Geopolymer Concrete

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Assistant Professor, Presidency University, Bangalore – 560064, Karnataka ,IN
  • Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Presidency University, Bangalore – 560064, Karnataka ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2023/35878

Keywords:

Alkaline Activator, Flyash, Geopolymer, GGBS, Nanofibres

Abstract

Due to an incessant upsurge in the construction industry and the steep increase in the cost of raw materials, researchers are focusing on various resources that can be replaced with cement as a construction material. One such material that is rich in Silicon and Aluminium is Flyash. Flyash as an additive to concrete made a way for a contemporary material that was coined as Geopolymer Concrete (GPC). In Geopolymer, alkaline activators such as sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide are mixed with sodium silicate so as to form geo-polymerization with products like GGBS, flyash etc. and which as a result binds the aggregate. This paper mainly emphasizes on role of Crumb Rubber (CR) in the formation of GPC replacing the fine aggregates by various percentages (5% - 15%) of CR. The Geopolymer mix design is proposed for M40 grade. Compressive and tensile strength tests were carried out on concrete modified with Flyash and GGBS (Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag) in 60:40 ratios. At a molarity of 14M, ratio of sodium silicate to sodium hydroxide is maintained as 2.5. The samples were placed in an ambient condition and were tested for strength on 7, 14 and 28 days. Based on the experimental results, it was observed that use of CR in GPC does not enhance the strength properties and cannot be used in high-end structural applications only.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2023-12-20

How to Cite

Nair, D., & Kulkarni, D. M. G. R. (2023). Suitability Study on Strength Properties of Crumb Rubber in Geopolymer Concrete. Journal of Mines, Metals and Fuels, 71(10), 1809–1816. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2023/35878

 

References

Siddique R, Rajor A and Jain A. Mechanical and durability properties of geopolymer concrete incorporating crumb rubber aggregates. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021; 280:124443

Zhang Z, Zhang Y and Chen X. Mechanical and thermal properties of crumb rubber–sand–geopolymer composites. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022; 330:129137.

Abdelhameed M and Ibrahim O. Performance of crumb rubber geopolymer concrete under severe environmental conditions. Construction and Building Materials. 2021; 297:123777.

Gill P, Jangra P, Roychand R, Saberian M, and Li J. Effects of various additives on the crumb rubber integrated geopolymer concrete. Journal of Cleaner Materials. 2023; 8:100181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clema.2023.100181

Liu Z, Zhang Z and Deng X. Experimental investigation on the effects of crumb rubber on the mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 2020; 241:118034.

Patil SG, Rampanth. Experimental studies of Ambient Cured Geopolymer Concrete. Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering. 2017; 14(3):44-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9790/1684-1403014449

Rangan VB. Mix design and production of flyash based geopolymer concrete. Indian Concrete Journal, 2008; 82(5):7-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420007657.ch26

Singh RP, Goyal S and Goyal A. Influence of crumb rubber on mechanical and durability properties of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2020; 32(11):04020342.

Rangan VB. Concrete Construction Engineering Handbook; Taylor and Francis group, CRC presss: New Jersey.

Patil VV and Deshamukh SP. Comparative Analysis of Geopolymer Concretewith Different Proportions of Fly ash and GGBS with Conventional Concrete Considering the Strength and Durability Parameters. IJRASET. 2022; 10(11):73-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2022.47259