Effect of Different Processing Methods on Composition, Biological Activities and Permeability of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.): An Indigenous Cereal

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Shital Giramkar
     Obesity- Diabetes Lab, Interactive Research School for Health Affairs (IRSHA) Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed (to be) University, Dhankawadi, Pune – 411043, Maharashtra ,IN
  • Sarika Mane
     Obesity- Diabetes Lab, Interactive Research School for Health Affairs (IRSHA) Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed (to be) University, Dhankawadi, Pune – 411043, Maharashtra ,IN
  • Abhilasha Dolle
     Obesity- Diabetes Lab, Interactive Research School for Health Affairs (IRSHA) Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed (to be) University, Dhankawadi, Pune – 411043, Maharashtra ,IN
  • Jyoti Shirodkar
     Shirodkar’s Health Solution Pvt. Ltd., Bavdhan – 411021, Pune ,IN
  • Supriya Bhalerao
     Obesity- Diabetes Lab, Interactive Research School for Health Affairs (IRSHA) Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed (to be) University, Dhankawadi, Pune – 411043, Maharashtra ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/jnr/2024/32417

Keywords:

Ayurveda, Advanced Glycation End Products, β-glucan, Functional Food

Abstract

Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) is a cereal rich in soluble dietary fibres, and antioxidant and bioactive compounds. Ayurveda reported its use as a therapeutic food. Being a rich source of functional ingredients, it has the potential to be incorporated for nutritional enrichment. Still, there are certain limitations to its use. The present study first time analyses the effect of different processing methods recommended in Ayurveda on variation in its composition and permeability. The hulled barley was processed namely dry roasting, roasting with cow ghee and roasting after overnight soaking in Triphala decoction. Further evaluated for proximate composition, in vitro anti-glycation and permeability of soluble fibres. A variation in proximate composition was seen in all processed forms. Soluble fibre content was maximum in hulled barley. The β-glucan of hulled barley was 39.41 mg/g, which was increased up to 62.22 mg/g in dry roasted barley. All processed forms exhibited inhibition of glycation, which was maximum with Triphala-soaked barley. Processing improved the permeability of soluble fibres, which was maximum with dry roasted form (54%). Dry-roasted barley showed improvement in almost all analyzed parameters. Hence, it can be explored further to facilitate the use of barley as a dietary supplement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2024-01-01

How to Cite

Giramkar, S., Mane, S., Dolle, A., Shirodkar, J., & Bhalerao, S. (2024). Effect of Different Processing Methods on Composition, Biological Activities and Permeability of Barley (<i>Hordeum vulgare</i> L.): An Indigenous Cereal. Journal of Natural Remedies, 24(1), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.18311/jnr/2024/32417

Issue

Volume 24, Issue 1, January 2024

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Shital Giramkar, Sarika Mane, Abhilasha Dolle, Jyoti Shirodkar, Supriya Bhalerao (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Received 2023-01-14
Accepted 2023-10-10
Published 2024-01-01

 

References

Gong L, Cao W, Chi H, Wang J, Zhang H, Liu J, et al. Wholecereal grains and potential health effects: Involvement ofthe gut microbiota. Food Research International. 2018;103:84-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.10.025PMid:29389647 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.10.025

Newman RK, Newman CW. Barley for food and health:Science, technology, and products. John Wiley and Sons;2008. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470369333 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470369333

Khoury ED, Cuda C, Luhovyy BL, Anderson GH. 2012.Beta glucan: Health benefits in obesity and metabolicsyndrome. Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism. 2012; p.1-28. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/851362 PMid:22187640PMCid:PMC3236515 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/851362

Blaak EE, Antoine JM, Benton D, Björck I, Bozzetto L, BrounsF, et al. Impact of postprandial glycaemia on health andprevention of disease. Obesity Reviews. 2012; 13(10):923-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2012.01011.x PMid:22780564 PMCid:PMC3494382 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2012.01011.x

Iglesia DR, Kohen LV, Zulet MA, Martinez JA, Reglero G,Molina RA. Dietary strategies implicated in the preventionand treatment of metabolic syndrome. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2016; 17(11):1877. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17111877 PMid:27834920 PMCid: PMC5133877 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17111877

Pushpa HK, Varadacharyulu NC. Barley based food provideconsumers with reliable, healthy food choice. International Journal of Research in Arts and Science. 2017; 3(1):1-3.https://doi.org/10.9756/IJRAS.8308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9756/IJRAS.8308

Bi M, Niu Y, Li X, Li Y, Sun C. Effects of barley flakes onmetabolism of glucose and lipids in the patients withimpaired fasting glucose. Diabetes. 2013; 42(5):719-23.

Kaur KD, Jha A, Sabikhi L, Singh AK. Significance ofcoarse cereals in health and nutrition: A review. Journalof Food Science and Technology. 2014; 51(8):1429-41.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0612-9 PMid:25114333PMCid:PMC4108649 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0612-9

Baik BK. Current and potential barley grain food products.Cereal Foods World. 2016; 61(5):188-96. https://doi.org/10.1094/CFW-61-5-0188 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/CFW-61-5-0188

Shehry GAA. Preparation and quality evaluation of pastasubstituted with Hull-less Barley Aust. Journal of Basic andApplied Sciences. 2017; 11(1):98-106.

Farag MA, Xiao J, Abdallah HM. Nutritional value of barleycereal and better opportunities for its processing as a value-added food: A comprehensive review. Critical Reviews inFood Science and Nutrition. 2022; 62(4):1092-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2020.1835817 PMid:33092405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2020.1835817

Liu G, Zhou Y, Chen L. Intestinal uptake of barley protein basednano particle for beta carotene delivery. Acta PharmaceuticaSinica B. 2019; 9(1):87-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2018.10.002 PMid:30766780 PMCid:PMC6362262 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2018.10.002

Jacob J, Pescatore A. Barley β-glucan in poultry diets.Annals of Translational Medicine. 2014; 2(2):10.

Skouroliakou M, Ntountaniotis D, Kastanidou O, MassaraP. Evaluation of Barley’s beta-glucan food fortificationthrough investigation of intestinal permeability in healthyadults. Journal of the American College of Nutrition. 2016;35(1):13-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2014.967893 PMid:25915826 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2014.967893

Yadav T. Charaksamhita of Acharya Agnivesha,Cakrapanidatta, Commentator, Chaukhamba SanskritSansthan, Varanasi, Chikitsastana 6/12-24; 2009a.

Sastri HS. Astangahrdaya of Vagbhata, Ayurved Rasayanateeka, Reprint edition, Varanasi: Chaukhamba SanskritSansthan; 2016. p. 93.

Pandey GS. Bhavaprakasha of Bhavamishra, enlarged edition,Varanasi: Chaukhambha Bharti Academy; 2010. p. 727.

Sekar S. Traditional alcoholic beverages from Ayurveda andtheir role on human health. Indian Journal of TraditionalKnowledge. 2007; 6(1):144-9.

Sharma P. Sushruta Samhita, Chaukhambha Visvabharati,Varanasi (in Sanskrit with English Translation).Sutrasthana.Chp 46; 1999.

Sharma P, Kotari SL. Barley: Impact of processing onphysicochemical and thermal properties - A review, FoodReviews International. 2017; 33(4):359-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2016.1175009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2016.1175009

Izydorczyk MS, Dexter JE. Barley β-glucans and arabinoxylans:Molecular structure, physicochemical properties, and uses in food products-a Review. Food Research International. 2008;41(9):850-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2008.04.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2008.04.001

Semedo MC, Karmali A, Fonseca L. A high throughputcolorimetric assay of β-1,3-D-glucans by Congo red dye.Journal of Microbiological Methods. 2015; 109:140-8.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2014.12.020 PMid:25555819 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2014.12.020

Indian Standard. Method for determination of protein infoods and feeds, Food Hygiene, Sampling and AnalysisSectional Committee, AFDC 36. ISSN: 7219–1973; 1973.

Saraswat M, Reddy PY, Muthenna P, Reddy GB. Preventionof non-enzymic glycation of proteins by dietary agents:Prospects for alleviating diabetic complications. BritishJournal of Nutrition. 2009; 101(11):1714-21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114508116270 PMid:18986599 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114508116270

Tupe RS, Sankhe NM, Shaikh SA, Phatak DV, Parikh JU,Khaire AA, et al. Aqueous extract of some indigenousmedicinal plants inhibits glycation at multiple stages andprotects erythrocytes from oxidative damage-an in vitrostudy. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2015;52(4):1911-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-013-1211-8PMid:25829572 PMCid:PMC4375206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-013-1211-8

Regand A, Tosh SM, Wolever TM, Wood PJ. Physicochemicalproperties of beta-glucan in differently processed oatfoods influence glycemic response. Journal of Agriculturaland Food Chemistry. 2009; 57(19):8831-8. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf901271v PMid:19728711 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf901271v

Agume ASN, Njintang NY, Mbofung CMF. Effect ofsoaking and roasting on the physicochemical andpasting properties of soybean flour. Foods. 2017; 6(2):12.https://doi.org/10.3390/foods6020012 PMid:28231091PMCid:PMC5332905 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods6020012

Sakhawat A, Saima N, Shumaila U, Zahida N, Ume K,Tanzeela I. Study on the biochemical effects of barley fibreon the hypercholesterolaemic rats. African Journal of PlantScience. 2014; 8:237-42. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPS11.145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPS11.145

Arendt EK, Emanuele Zannini. Cereal grains for the foodand beverage industries. Woodhead Publishing Series inFood Science, Technology and Nutrition; 2013. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857098924 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857098924

Parveen R, Shamsi TN, Singh G, Athar T, FatimaS. Phytochemical analysis and in-vitro biochemicalcharacterization of aqueous and methanolic extract ofTriphala, a conventional herbal remedy. Biotechnology reports(Amsterdam). 2018; 17:126-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2018.02.003 PMid:29619331 PMCid:PMC5881245 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2018.02.003

Dhingra D, Michael M, Rajput H, Patil RT. Dietary fibre infoods: A review. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2012;49(3):255-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0365-5PMid:23729846 PMCid:PMC3614039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0365-5

Thed ST, Philips RD. Changes of dietary fibre andstarch composition of processed potato products duringdomestic cooking. Food Chemistry. 1995; 52:301-4https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(95)92828-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(95)92828-8

Henrion M, Francey C, Lê KA, Lamothe L. Cereal B-Glucans.The impact of processing and how it affects physiologicalresponses. Nutrients. 2019; 11(8):1729. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11081729 PMid:31357461 PMCid:PMC6722849 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11081729

Planas A. Bacterial 1,3-1,4-beta-glucanases: structure, functionand protein engineering. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)- Protein Structure and Molecular Enzymology. 2000; 1543(2):361-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4838(00)00231-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4838(00)00231-4

Veena A, Urooj A, Puttaraj S. Effect of processing on thecomposition of dietary fibre and starch in some legumes.Nahrung. 1995; 39(2):132-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/food.19950390206 PMid:7783778 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/food.19950390206

Shahidi F, Ambigaipalan P. Phenolics and polyphenolicsin foods, beverages and spices: Antioxidant activity andhealth effects - A review. Journal of Functional Foods. 2015;18:820-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2015.06.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2015.06.018