Comparison of Lip Print and Finger Print in Sex Determination of Salem Population

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Suryagopan P.
     Post Graduate, Department of Oral Pathology, Vinayaka Mission's Sankarachariyar Dental College, Salem - 636308, Tamil Nadu ,IN
  • Maya Ramesh
     Reader, Department of Oral Pathology, Vinayaka Mission's Sankarachariyar Dental College, Salem - 636308, Tamil Nadu ,IN
  • Sekar B.
     Professor & Head of the Department, Department of Oral Pathology, Vinayaka Mission's Sankarachariyar Dental College, Salem - 636308, Tamil Nadu ,IN
  • Mathew Jacob
     Reader, Department of Oral Pathology, Vinayaka Mission's Sankarachariyar Dental College, Salem - 636308, Tamil Nadu, India ,IN
  • Rajathi Arun
     Reader, Department of Oral Pathology, Vinayaka Mission's Sankarachariyar Dental College, Salem - 636308, Tamil Nadu ,IN
  • Indra Priyadharshini
     Senior Lecturer, Reader, Department of Oral Pathology, Vinayaka Mission's Sankarachariyar Dental College, Salem - 636308, Tamil Nadu ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/jpfa/2020/24660

Keywords:

Finger Print, Forensic, Lip Print, Salem
Forensic Odontology

Abstract

Background: In the field of forensic sciences, Practitioners face major problems in personal identification of humans. Lip prints and finger prints can serve as a significant tool for such identification and gender determination as they are unique and distinguishable to each individual. Aim: This study was aimed to evaluate the comparison of lip print and finger print pattern in Salem population for sex determination. Methods: This study comprises 200 lip prints (100 females and 100 males) which were randomly selected among Salem population with age ranging from 15 to 30 years and were collected with lip stick with the help of a cellophane tape on a white sheet, the same people were asked to press the cleaned fingers of right hand over ink-stained pad and the impression of inked finger was then transferred to the same white paper. Lip prints and Finger prints were examined with magnifying hand lens for pattern distribution - classified, recorded and analyzed. Results: Our study proved that the prevalent lip print in the males and females were Type III and type I respectively. The most prevalent finger print in the male was whorls Type and in female it was Loop type. There is statistically significant association between of these two parameters (p value=0.001) and thus these combinations can be implicated in detection of individuals. Conclusion: The use of lip and finger print patterns has been suggested to be consistent and reliable to suspect a fault. Correlation of these two parameters has significant association and thus the result of the present study can provide an additional tool in forensic science for gender determination.

Downloads

Published

2020-04-16

How to Cite

P., S., Ramesh, M., B., S., Jacob, M., Arun, R., & Priyadharshini, I. (2020). Comparison of Lip Print and Finger Print in Sex Determination of Salem Population. Journal of Pierre Fauchard Academy (India Section), 34(1), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.18311/jpfa/2020/24660

Issue

Volume 34, Issue 1, March 2020

Section

Original Articles

License

All the articles published in JPFA are distributed under a creative commons license. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright of their work (all usages allowed except for commercial purpose).

 

References

Metgud R, Kaur M, Naik S, Tak A, Patel S. Correlation between lip prints and finger prints in Gujrati Population - A forensic study. J. Adv. Med. Dent. Scie. Res. 2016; 4(3):30-34.

Gopichand PV, Kaushal S, Kaur G. Personal identification using lip prints (Cheiloscopy) - A study in 500 Punjabi females. J. Indo. Pacific Acad. Forensic Odontol. 2010; 1:2022.

Janardhanam Dineshshankar, Nalliappan Ganapathi, Thukanaykanpalayam Ragunathan Yoithapprabhunath, Thangadurai Maheswaran, Muniapillai Siva Kumar, Ravi Aravindhan. Lip prints: Role in forensic odontology. J. Pharm. Bioallied. Sci. 2013 Jun; 5(Suppl 1): S95-S97. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.113305. PMid: 23946586, PMCid: PMC3722715.

Kavitha Einstein A, Sivapathasundharam B, Saraswathi TR. Limitations in forensic Odontology. J. of Forensic Odontology. 2009; 1:8-10. https://doi.org/10.4103/09742948.50881.

El Domiaty MA, Algaidi SA, Elayat AA, Safwat MD, Galal SA. Morphological patterns of lip prints in Saudi Arabia at Almadinah Almonawarah province. Forensic Sci. Int. 2010; 200:179.e19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint. 2010.03.042. PMid: 20452154.

Nagrale N, Tirpude Bipinchandra, Murkey P, Patond S. Establishing cheiloscopy as a tool for identification: An assessment on 500 subjects in central India. Al Ameen J. Med. Sci. 2014; 201-204.

Augustine J, Barpande SR, Tupkari JV. Cheiloscopy as an adjunct to forensic identification: A study of 600 individuals. J. Forensic Odontostomatol. 2008; 26:4452.

Kaushal N, Kaushal P. Human identification and fingerprints: A review. J. Biomet. Biostat. 2011; 2:123. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6180.1000123, https://doi.org/10.4172/ 2155-6180.1000129.

Murugan M, Karikalan T. A study of relative correlation between the pattern of finger prints and lip prints. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences. 2014; 3(56):1276812772. https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2014/3694.

Kumaran SM, Bastia BK, Kumar L, Patel S. Correlation between fingerprint and lip print pattern in Gujarati population. Medico-Legal Update. 2017; 17(1):217221. DOI: 10.5958/0974-1283.2017.00047.0. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-1283.2017.00047.0.

Ahmed SA, Hanan ES, Marwa MF. Forensic dissection of lip print as an investigative tool in a mixed Egyptian population. Alexandria Journal of Medicine. 2018; 54:235-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajme.2017.08.002.

Neha Bansal, Soheyl Sheikh, Richa Bansal, Shambulingappa Pallagati. Correlation between lip prints and finger prints in sex determination and pattern predominance in 5000 subjects. Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology. 2013; 31(1): 8-14.