An Empirical Study on Preserving Sensitive Knowledge in Data Mining

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • S. Dhanalakshmi
     Department of Software Systems, Sri Krishna Arts and Science College, Coimbatore – 641008, Tamil Nadu ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15613/sijrs/2018/v5i1/188667

Keywords:

Association Rules, Privacy Preservation, Rule Hiding, Sensitive Knowledge.

Abstract

Protection of data in data mining involves preserving sensitive data and sensitive knowledge. Preserving sensitive data focus on protecting the data when it is shared for mining with third parties. In some situations even the result of data mining techniques might reveal sensitive information. This area of research which focuses on output preservation of data mining techniques is termed as Preserving Sensitive Knowledge. The sensitive results of data mining are preserved by reducing the efficiency of the result. In this paper, an empirical study on existing sensitive knowledge preservation approaches is discussed. The approaches include rule hiding in association rule mining and classification technique. The output data protection also includes the restriction in query processing. The article highlights the merits and demerits on each approach.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-01

Issue

Volume 5,Issue 1, January-June 2018

Section

Articles

 

References

Aggarwal CC, Yu PS. A general survey of privacy-preserving data mining models and algorithms. Privacy-preserving Data Mining; 2008. p. 11–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-38770992-5_2

Agrawal D, Aggarwal CC. On the design and quantification of privacy preserving data mining algorithms. Proceedings of the Twentieth ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems; 2001. p. 247–55. https://doi.org/10.1145/375551.375602

Chen K, Liu L. A survey of multiplicative perturbation for privacy-preserving data mining. Privacy-Preserving Data Mining. 2008. p. 157–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-38770992-5_7

Warner SL. Randomized response: A survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1965; 60(309):63–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1965.10480775

Refaat M, Aboelseoud H, Shafee K, Badr M. Privacy preserving association rule hiding techniques: Current research challenges. International Journal of Computer Applications. 2016; 136(6):11–7. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2016908446

Telikani A, Shahbahrami A. Data sanitization in association rule mining: An analytical review. Expert Systems with Applications. 2018; 96:406–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.10.048

Garg V, Singh A, Singh D. A survey of association rule hiding algorithms. 2014 Fourth Intenational Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies, IEEE; 2014. p. 404–7. PMid: 25657953 PMCid: PMC4311352. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSNT.2014.86

Natwichai J, Li X, Orlowska M. Hiding classification rules for data sharing with privacy preservation. International Conference on Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery; Springer; Berlin, Heidelberg. 2005 Aug. p. 468–77). https://doi.org/10.1007/11546849_46

Dwork C, Kenthapadi K, Mcsherry F, Mironov I, Naor M. Our data, ourselves: Privacy via distributed noise generation. Advances in Cryptology-EUROCRYPT; 2006. p. 486–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/11761679_29

Thong T, Buttyan L. Query auditing for protecting max/min values of sensitive attributes in statistical databases. Trust, Privacy and Security in Digital Business. 2012. p. 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32287-7_17