Bioefficacy and mass culturing of Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Nematoda:Heterorhabditidae) on cabbage butterfly, Pieris brassicae (Lepidoptera:Pieridae) in temperate region of Kashmir, Indi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/2021/23101Keywords:
Bioefficacy, entomopathogenic nematode, Heterorhabditis bacteriophora, Pieris brassicaeAbstract
A laboratory investigation was carried out to assess the bioefficacy and mass culturing of Kashmir isolate of entomopathogenic nematode (EPN), Heterorhabditis bacteriophora on cabbage butterfly, Pieris brassicae in Srinagar. The pathogenicity of H. bacteriophora against 3rd, 4th and 5th larval instars of P. brassicae showed cent per cent mortality of the pest in all the three larval instars at the dosages of 20 IJs/larva and above. The LC50 values of H. bacteriophora against 3rd, 4th and 5th larval instars of P. brassicae ranged from 46.61 to 9.32, 76.33 to 9.82 and 91.36 to 10.08 IJs/larva at 24 to 96 h and that the LT50 values from 65.15 to 23.12, 84.54 to 29.20 and 105.36 to 33.52 h at 10 to 60 IJs/larva, respectively. The average production of nematode infective juveniles per larvae was found to be 7.02 x 103, 25.74 x 103 and 58.45 x 103 and that from per gram of host body weight was 91.49 x 103, 151.30 x 103 and 233.78 x 103 in 3rd, 4th and 5th larval instars of P. brassicae, respectively. The total time period between the larval mortality and the initiation of emergence of the infective juveniles from the cadavers ranged from 7-8, 9-10 and 10-11 days and the peak period of emergence of infective juveniles ranged from 10-13, 14-19, 16-21 days after mortality from the cadavers of 3rd, 4th and 5th larval instars of P. brassicae, respectively. The total duration of nematode emergence recorded during the period between larval mortality and cessation of emergence of infective juveniles from the cadavers ranged 17-19, 23-25 and 26-29 days after mortality in case of 3rd, 4th and 5th larval instars of P. brassicae, respectively.Downloads
Metrics
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Accepted 2021-06-18
Published 2021-09-29
References
Divya K, Sankar M. 2009. Entomopathogenic nematodes in pest management. Indian J Sci Technol. 2:53–60. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2009/v2i7.12
Flanders KL, Miller JM, Shields EJ. 1996. In vivo production of Heterorhabditis bacteriophora ‘Oswego' (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae), a potential biological control agent for soil-inhabiting insects in temperate regions. J Econ Entom. 89:373–380. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/89.2.373
Karunakar G, Easwaramoorthy S, David H. 2000. Host parasite interaction between two species of white grubs infesting sugarcane and two species of entomopathogenic nematodes. Sug Technol.. 2(4):12–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02995579
Kaya HK. 1985. Entomogenous nematodes for insect control in IPM systems. pp. 283–302. In: Hoy MA. and Herzog DC. (Eds.). Biological Control in Agriculture IPM Systems. New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-357030-7.50022-3
Kaya HK. 1990. Soil Ecology. Entomopathogenic nematodes. Ann Rev Entomol. 38:181–206. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.38.010193.001145
Khan MR, Khan U, Askary TH, Mohiddin FA, Khan MM. 2007. Pathogenicity and host suitability for in vivo mass production of Steinernema masoodi AMU EPN-1. Int J Nematol. 17:151–157.
Rajkumar M, Parihar A, Siddiqui AU. 2002. Mass multiplication of indigenous entomopathogenic nematodes of Udaipur. Proceedings of National Symposium on biodiversity and management of nematodes in cropping systems for sustainable agriculture, November 11-13, 2002. ARS, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India; p. 77.