Extraction and evaluation of chitosan as an insecticide against saw-toothed grain beetle, Oryzaephilus surinamensis L. (Coleoptera: Silvanidae)

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Department of Biology, College of Education for Pure Sciences, University of Kirkuk, Kirkuk - 36001 ,IQ
  • Department of Biology, College of Education for Pure Sciences, University of Kirkuk, Kirkuk - 36001 ,IQ
  • Department of Chemistry, College of Sciences, University of Kirkuk, Kirkuk - 36001 ,IQ

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/2024/45785

Keywords:

Chitosan, concentrations, life cycle, rice, saw-toothed grain beetle

Abstract

Rice samples infested with saw-toothed grain beetles have been collected from a local market in the city of Kirkuk/Iraq. The study was conducted in Kirkuk during the period 15 December 2023 to 25 April 2024, at College of Pure Sciences at the University of Kirkuk, Iraq. Chitosan was utilised in the study to examine its toxic effects at three different concentrations (0.5, 1.0, 1.5 ppm) on the life cycle of the saw-toothed grain beetle, focusing on oviposition rate, duration of larval and pupal stages, and mortality rate of its adults. The chemical demonstrated a substantial effect in lowering the number of eggs laid as the concentration increased, with the control treatment registering the highest oviposition rate of 314.14 eggs compared to 209.31, 117.03, and 61.12 eggs for chitosan concentrations of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 ppm, respectively. The shortest egg incubation period recorded was 8.17 days, Incubation times for chitosan treatments increased significantly to 9.66, 11.69, and 14.00 days for concentrations of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 ppm, respectively, demonstrating an inverse association with concentration levels. Furthermore, the emergence rate of beetles decreased as concentration increased. The emergence counts for the chitosan treatments at concentrations of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 ppm dropped to 133.11, 55.69, and 30.12 beetles, respectively, with the control treatment having the highest average emergence of 289.43 beetles. The larval stage duration showed a direct proportionality with chitosan concentrations, with the 1.5 ppm concentration marking the longest larval duration at 22.00 days, significantly surpassing all other concentrations. The control treatment recorded the shortest duration at 13.56 days, whereas 0.5 and 1.0 ppm concentrations resulted in duration of 17.19 and 19.66 days, respectively. For the pupal stage, significant differences were observed with increasing chitosan concentration; the control treatment displayed the shortest pupal duration at 4.33 days. A direct relationship was found between the concentrations and pupal stage duration, reducing the period to 6.00, 7.59, and 9.07 days for concentrations of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 ppm, respectively. Chitosan exhibited significant differences from the second day of the experiment, as the mortality rate increased with concentration and over time. The concentration of 1.5 ppm showed the highest mortality rate at 98.62% after 16 days, whereas the control treatment recorded the lowest rate at 33.17%. Based on the results of the current study, chitosan can be utilized as an effective pesticide for controlling stored-product pests, particularly the saw-toothed grain beetle.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2024-10-08

How to Cite

JAMAL, A. M., HAIDAR, A. A., & MOHAMMED, M. O. (2024). Extraction and evaluation of chitosan as an insecticide against saw-toothed grain beetle, <i>Oryzaephilus surinamensis</i> L. (Coleoptera: Silvanidae). Journal of Biological Control, 38(3), 329–336. https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/2024/45785

Issue

Section

Research Articles
Received 2024-09-09
Accepted 2024-09-18
Published 2024-10-08

 

References

Abd, W. Y. 2012. Effect of aqueous and hexane extract of cumin and sweet seed plants in larvae of the Trogoderma granarium capillary beetle (Everts). Al-Rafidain Journal of Agriculture, 40(4): 245-253.

Al-Hadidi, S. N., Khames, N., and Matni, H. A. 2014.The effect of using some spices in controlling the red flour beetle insect. Diyala J Agricult Sci, 6(6): 248-257.

Al-Yunis, A., Mahfouz, A. Q., and Zaki, A. E. 1987. Crops of grains. Dar Al-Kutub for Printing and Publishing. University of Mosul, Iraq.

Athanassiou, C. G., Kavallieratos, N. G., Benelli, G., Losic, D., Rani, P. U., and Desneux, N. 2017. Nanoparticles and polymers for pest control: Current status and future. Perspect, 91(1): 1-15 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340017-0898-0

Campos, E. V. R., Proença, P. L. F., Oliveira, J. L., Pereira, A. E. S., Ribeiro, L. N. M., Fernandes, F. O., …, Fraceto, L. F. 2018. Carvacrol and linalool co-loaded in β-cyclodextringrafted chitosan nanoparticles as sustainable biopesticide aiming pest control. Sci Rep, 8(1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-01826043-x.

Folsum, J. W. 1931. A chemotrophometer. J Econ Entomo, 24: 827-833. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/24.4.827

Ghormade, V., Deshpande, M. V., and Paknikar, K. M. 2011. Perspectives for nanobiotechnology enabled protection and nutrition of plants. J Biotech Adv, 29(6): 792-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.06.007

Hadi, O. H. A. 2021. The impact of ethanol and hexane extracts from Moringa oleifera Leaves on the viability of the khapra beetle (Trogoderma granarium (Everts)) [Master’s Thesis. College of Agriculture. University of Baghdad].

Haj, N. Q., Mohammed, M. O., and Mohammood, L. E. b2020. Synthesis and biological evaluation of three new chitosan Schiff base derivatives. University of Kirkuk. ACS Omega, 5(23): 13948-13954. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c01342

Jassim, R. A. 2018. The impact of levels and timings of spraying with the nano-fertilizer microplus super on the concentration of some minor elements in dry matter and the yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Journal of Kerbala for Agricultural Sciences, 5(5): 255-264.

Hamid, A. A. 2023. The impact of nanopolymeric capsules of the crude extract of the fungus Metarhizium anisopliae on some biological aspects of the housefly Musca domestica Linnaeus, 1785. [Doctoral dissertation, College of Science for Girls, University of Baghdad].

Hayles, J., Johnson, L., Worthley, C., and Losic, D. 2017. Nanopesticides: A review of current research and

perspectives. New pesticides and soil sensors (pp. 193-225). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804299-1.00006-0

Hill, D. S. 2002. Pests of stored food stuffs and their control, Kluwer Academic Publishers. http://www.particleandfibretoxicology.com/content/10/1/1.

Jia, Z., and Xu, W. 2001. Synthesis and antibacterial activities of quaternary ammonium salt of chitosan.

Carbohydr Res, 333(1): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6215(01)00112-4

Kalaf, F. I., Mustafa, T. A., and Hassan, A. A. 2022. Use some nanomaterials as insecticides against the saw-toothed grain beetle Oryzaephilus surinamensis L.(Coleoptera: Silvanidae). University of Kirkuk. Kirkuk J Agricult Sci; 13(3).

Keita, S. M., Vincent, C., Schmit, T. P., Arnason, J. T., and Belanger, A. 2001. Efficacy of essential oil of Ocimum basilicum L. and O. gratissimum L. applied as an insecticidal fumigant and powder to control Callosobruchus maculatus Fab. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). J Stor Prod Res, 37:339-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-474X(00)00034-5

Keshmar, I. Z. 2023. The biological evaluation of the chileman bio-polymer formulation with some safe and environmentally friendly pesticides in controlling the Southern Cowpea Beetle (Callosobruchus maculatus) [Master’s Thesis, College of Agriculture, University of Diyala].

Panith, N., Wichaphon, J., Lertsiri, S., and Niamsiri, N. 2016. Effect of physical and physicochemical characteristics of chitosan on fat-binding capacities under in vitro gastrointestinal conditions. LWT-Food Sci Technol; 71: 25-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2016.03.013

Pricket, A. J. 1990. Commercial grain stores 1988/89. England and Wales storage and pest incidence hone grown .cereal’s Authority report. (In Press).

Rajkumar, V., Gunasekaran, C., Paul, C. A., and Dharmaraj, J. 2020. Development of encapsulated peppermint essential oil in chitosan nanoparticles: Characterization and biological efficacy against stored-grain pest control. Pestic Biochem Physiol, 170: 104679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2020.104679

Ribeiro, C., Vicente, A. A., Teixeira, J. A., and Miranda, C. 2007. Optimization of edible coating composition to retard strawberry fruit senescence. Postharvest Biol Technol, 44: 63-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2006.11.015

Sabbour, M. M., and Abdel-Hakim, E. A. 2018. Control of Cassida vittata (Vill) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) using chitosan and nanochitosan. Middle East J Appl Sci, 8(1): 141-144.

Saharan, V., Sharma, G., Yadav, M., Choudhary, M. K., Sharma, S. S. A., Raliya, P., and Biswas, R. 2015.

Synthesis and in vitro antifungal efficacy of Cu-chitosan nanoparticles against pathogenic fungi of tomato. Int J Biol Macromol, 75: 346-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.01.027

Sahuki, M. M. 1990.Yellow corn. Dar Al-Hekma for Printing and Publishing.

Shaaban, A., and Mallah, N. M. 1993. Pesticides ministry of higher education and scientific research. Dar Al-Kutub for Printing and Publishing. University of Mosul.

Taain, D. A., Hamza, H. A., and Jaber, F. N. 2019. September The effect of cultivar, chitosan and storage period on qualitative characteristics of date palm fruits (Phoenix dactylifera l.) and their infection with the saw-toothed grain beetle. J Phys Conf Ser, 1294(9). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1294/9/092004

Xia, W., Liu, P., Zhang, J., and Chen, J. 2011. Biological activities of chitosan and chitooligosaccharides. Food Hydrocoll, 25(2): 170-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2010.03.003

Younes, I., and Rinaudo, M. 2015. Chitin and chitosan preparation from marine sources. Structure, properties and applications. Mar Drugs, 13(3): 1133-1174. https://doi.org/10.3390/md13031133

Zhang, R. M., Dong, J. F., Chen, J. H., JI, Q. E., and Cul, J .J. 2013. The sublethal effects of chlorantraniliprole on Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae. J Integr Agric, 12(3): 457-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60246-4