Kin recognition by the adults of a biological control agent, Propylea dissecta (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/2020/24757Keywords:
Egg cannibalism, kin recognition, Propylea dissectaAbstract
The ability to recognize kin is a well-established behavior across several animal phyla including insects. A laboratory experiment was designed to find out whether adults of an aphid-biocontrol agent, Propylea dissecta (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) may avoid consuming their own eggs in prey scarcity in the presence of unrelated conspecific eggs. For the purpose, starved parent ladybirds were provided with their eggs and unrelated conspecific (alien) eggs in the absence of their natural prey (aphids). The predatory/avoidance behavior of the parents towards alien-eggs and their eggs was recorded. The adult male of P. dissecta had lesser food demand than the female and consumed significantly lesser (0.7±0.20) kin eggs than the alien eggs (2.8±1.89). Similarly, the adult female cannibalized significantly lesser number of kin eggs (1.6±0.209) than the alien-eggs (3.5±0.15). Seemingly, both the parents had recognized their eggs and refrained from consuming them. This could be a strategy adopted by the parents to conserve their gene-pool and to further protect it by consuming the heterospecific eggs of potential enemies (alien eggs) in prey scarcity. This insurance of their gene-pool could benefit these parents by conserving their genetic lines.Downloads
Metrics
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Accepted 2020-12-28
Published 2021-02-11
References
Agarwala BK, Dixon AFG. 1993. Kin recognition: egg and larval cannibalism in Adalia bipunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Eur. J. Entomol. 90: 45–50.
Bayoumy MH, Michaud JP. 2015. Egg cannibalism and its life history consequences vary with life stage, sex, and reproductive status in Hippodamia convergens (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). J. Econ. Entomol.
(4): 1665–1674. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/jee/tov148.
Bos N, Grinsted L, Holman L. 2011. Wax on, wax off: nest soil facilitates indirect transfer of recognition cues between ant nestmates. PLoS ONE 6: e19435 (doi:10.1371/ journal. pone. 0019435.t001).
Fellowes MDE. 1998. Do non-social insects get the (kin) recognition they deserve? Ecol. Entomol. 23: 223–227. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2311.1998.00128.x
Joseph SB, Snyder WE, Moore AJ. 1999. Cannibalizing Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) larvae use endogenous cues to avoid eating relatives. J. Evol. Biol. 12: 792–797. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.14209101.1999.00077.x
Lihoreau M, Rivault C. 2009. Kin recognition via cuticular hydrocarbons shapes cockroach social life. Behav. Ecol. 20(1): 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arn113.
Omkar, Pervez A, Gupta AK. 2004. Role of chemicals in egg cannibalism and intraguild predation by neonates of two generalist ladybirds, Propylea dissecta and Coccinella transversalis. J. Appl. Ent. 128 (9-10): 691–695. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2004.00913.x
Omkar, Pervez A. 2016. Ladybird Beetles. pp. 281-310. In: Omkar (ed.). Ecofriendly Pest Management for Food Security. Academic Press. London, UK. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803265-7.00009-9
Pattanayak R, Mishra G, Chanotiya CS, Rout PK, Mohanty CS, Omkar. 2016. Semiochemical profile of four aphidophagous Indian ladybird beetles. Can. Ent. 148: 171–186. https://doi.org/10.4039/tce.2015.45
Pattanayak R, Mishra G, Omkar, Chanotiya CS, Rout PK, Mohanty CS. 2014. Does the volatile hydrocarbon profile differ between the: a case study on five aphidophagous ladybirds? Arch. Ins. Biochem. Physiol. 87: 105–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/arch.21184
Pervez A, Chandra S. 2018. Incidence of Egg-cannibalism by stage specific kins of two predaceous ladybirds (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). J. Mountain Res. 13: 45–50.
Pervez A, Gupta AK, Omkar. 2005. Kin recognition and avoidance of kin cannibalism in aphidophagous ladybirds: a laboratory study. Eur. J. Entomol. 102(3): 513–518. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2005.073
Pervez A, Kumar R. 2017. Preference of the aphidophagous ladybird, Propylea dissecta for two species of aphids reared on toxic host plants. Eur. J. Environ. Sci. 7(2): 130–134. https://doi.org/10.14712/23361964.
12
Pervez A, Omkar. 2004. Prey Dependent Life Attributes of an Aphidophagous Ladybird Beetle, Propylea dissecta (Mulsant). Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 14(4): 385–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583150410001683547
Pervez A, Omkar. 2005. Functional response of coccinellid predators: An illustration of a logistic approach. J. Insect Sci. 5(5): p.1–6. https://doi.org/10.1673/031.005.0501
Pervez A, Omkar. 2011. Ecology of an aphidophagous ladybird Propylea: A Review. J. Asia Pacific Entomol. 14(3): 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2011.01.001
Roy HE, Rudge H, Goldrick L, Hawkins D. 2007. Eat or be eaten: prevalence and impact of egg cannibalism on two-spot ladybirds, Adalia bipunctata. Entomologia experimentalis et Applicata 125(1): 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2007. 00592.x
SAS, 9.0 2002. SAS/Stat Version 9, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA. Saxena, S, Mishra G, Omkar. 2016. Inbreeding avoidance in aphidophagous ladybird beetles: a case study in Cheilomenes sexmaculata. Can. J. Zool. 94: 361–365. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2015-0174
Saxena S, Mishra G, Omkar. 2018. Familiarity dominates relatedness in mate selection in ladybirds. J. Zool. 304: 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12497
Schausberger P. 2007. Kin recognition by juvenile predatory mites: prior association or phenotype matching? Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 62: 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0444-9