Functional Response of Adalia tetraspilota (Hope) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) on Cabbage Aphid, Brevicoryne brassicae (L.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae)

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • A. A. Khan
     Division of Entomology, Sher–e–Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology (K), Shalimar Campus, Srinagar 191121, Jammu and Kashmir ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/2009/3671

Keywords:

Adalia tetraspilota, Aphididae, Brevicoryne brassicae, Coccinellidae, Functional Response, Handling Time, Predation and Search Rates.

Abstract

A study was conducted to assess the functional response of different life stages of the predacious coccinellid, Adalia tetraspilota (Hope) feeding on various densities of cabbage aphid, Brevicoryne brassicae (L.) under controlled conditions. It revealed that all stages of A. tetraspilota exhibit Type II functional response curve (a curvilinear rise to plateau) as B. brassicae densities increase and the curve predicted by Holling's disk equation did not differ significantly from the observed functional response curve. The fourth instar larva consumed more aphids (28.40 aphids / day) followed by adult female (25.06 aphids / day), third instar larva (24.06 aphids / day), second instar larva (21.73 aphids/ day), adult male (20.06 aphids/day) and first instar (13.06 aphid /day). The maximum search rate with shortest handling time was recorded for fourth instar larva (0.6383) followed by adult female (0.6264). The results suggest that the fourth instar larva are best suited for field releases for the management of B. brassicae. However, further field experiments are needed for confirming its potential.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2009-10-17

How to Cite

Khan, A. A. (2009). Functional Response of <I>Adalia tetraspilota</I> (Hope) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) on Cabbage Aphid, <I>Brevicoryne brassicae</I> (L.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Journal of Biological Control, 23(3), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/2009/3671

Issue

Volume 23, Issue 3, September 2009

Section

Articles
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

 

References

Cardoso, J. T. and Lazzari, S. M. N. 2003. Consumptionof Cinara spp. (Homoptera: Aphididae) byCycloneda sanguinea (Linnaeus, 1763) andHippodamia convergens Guerin–Meneville,1942 (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). RevistaBrasileria de Entomologia, 47: 443–446.

Hassell, M. P., Lawton, J. H. and Beddington, J. R. 1976. The components of arthropod predation. I. Theprey death rate. Journal of Animal Ecology,45: 135–164.

Hemptinne, J. L., Dixon, A. F. G. and Lognay, G. 1996. Search behaviour and mate recognition bymales of the two–spotted ladybird beetle, Adaliabipunctata. Ecological Entomology, 21: 165–170.

Holling, C. S. 1959. Some characteristics of simpletypes of predation and parasitism. CanadianEntomologist, 91: 385–398.

Holling, C. S. 1965. The functional response of predatorsto prey density and its role in mimicryand population regulation. Memoirs of theEntomological Society of Canada, 45: 3–60.

Isikber, A. A. 2005. Functional responses of two coccinellidpredators, Scymnus levaillanti and Cyclonedasanguinea, to the cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii. Turkey Journal of Agriculture, 29: 347–355.

Khan, A. A. and Mir, R. A. 2008. Functional response offour predaceous coccinellids Adalia tetraspilota(Hope), Coccinella septempunctata (L.), Calviapunctata (Mulsant) and Hippodamia variegata(Goeze) feeding on the green apple aphid, Aphispomi De Geer (Homoptera: Aphididae). Journalof Biological Control, 22: 291–298.

Khan, A. A. 2009. Functional response of different classsizes of predaceous ladybird beetle, Harmoniaeucharis (Mulsant) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)feeding on the green apple aphid, Aphis pomi DeGeer (Homoptera: Aphididae). Indian Journalof Agricultural Sciences (In press).

Khan, A. A., Zaki, F. A., Khan, Z. H. and Mir R. A. 2009. Biodiversity of predacious ladybird beetles(Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in Kashmir. Journalof Biological Control, 23: 43–47.

Mills, N. J. 1982. Satiation and the functional response:A test of a new model. Ecological Entomology,7: 305–315.

Nakamura, K. 1977. A model for the functional responseof a predator to varying prey densities based onthe feeding ecology of wolf spiders. Bulletin ofthe National Institute of Agricultural Sciences(Tokyo), Series C, 31: 29–89.

Ninkovic, V. and Pettersson, J. 2003. Searching behaviourof the seven spotted ladybird, Coccinellaseptempunctata–effects of plant-plant odourinteraction. Oikos, 100: 65–70.

Omkar and Pervez, A. 2003. Ecology and biocontrolpotential of a scale predator, Chilocorusnigritus. Biocontrol Science and Technology,13: 379–390.

Omkar and Pervez, A. 2004. Functional and numericalresponses of Propylea dissecta (Col.,Coccinellidae). Journal of Applied Entomology,128): 140–146.

Pervez, A. and Omkar, 2005. Functional responses ofcoccinellid predators: An illustration of alogistic approach. Journal of Insect Science, 5:319–325.

R Development Core Team 2008. R: A language andenvironment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna,Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org.

Roche, J. P. 1998. The functional response of increases inaphid density in female two-spotted lady beetles,Adalia bipunctata. Animal Behaviour Bulletin,3: 411-413.

Rogers, D. 1972. Random search and insect populationmodels. Journal of Animal Ecology, 41: 369–383.

Royama, T. 1971. A comparative study of models forpredation and parasitism. Researches onpopulation Ecology, Supplement, 1: 1–91.

Sarmento, R. A., Pallini, A., Venzon, M., Souza, O. F. F.,Molina-Rugama, A. J. and Limade Oliveira,C. 2007. Functional response of the predatorEriopis connexa (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)to different prey type. Brazilian Archives ofBiology and Technology, 50: 45–50.

Trexler, J. C., Mculloch, C. E. and Travis, J. 1988. Howcan the functional response best be determined?Oecologia, 76: 206–214.