A Review on Understanding the Crystallization Process of Bioglass in Recent Decade
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2022/32022Keywords:
Bioglass, crystallization kinetics, Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC), X-Ray Diffraction Analysis (XRD), Microscopy.Abstract
Bioglass is extensively used in clinical and bone tissue engineering, more specifically in orthopaedic as bone substitute in the form of granules or powders because of their excellent bioactivity, biodegradability and biocompatibility. They have the capability to form an integrated bond with bone through degradation and biomineralization at the surface of the living tissues. These activities are mainly driven by the composition, synthesis method and crystallinity of the bioglass. Therefore, in this paper we aimed at reviewing the basics and methods used in assessing the crystallization process of bioglasses and a few insights into crystallization revealed in the recent years. This critical review helps in tailoring and controlling crystallinity for their better applicability.
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
A.Z. Karimi et al. .., 0022-3093.
Bellucci D. et al. .., 2014. C, 43, pp.573- 586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.07.037
Boccaccini et al. .., 2007. 136, pp.27-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/b616539g
Bretcanu et al. .., 2009. 29(16), pp.3299-3306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.06.035
Cacciotti et al. .., 2012.23(8), pp.1849-1866. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-012-4667-6
Cannio M. et al. ...,2021 14(18), p.5440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14185440
Cattini A et al. .., 2013. 220, pp.52-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.10.076
Doweidar H et al. .., 2009. 355(9), pp.577-580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.02.007
F.J. Hmood et al. .., 2020. 6. 3, p.100027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceram.2020.100027
Hench L.L et al. .., 2011. 25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/9781848165595_0003
Jaimes et al. .., 2021. 41(9), pp.4958-4969. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.02.051
Jones, J.R. 9(1), pp.4457-4486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.023
K. Zheng et al. .., 2015.98(1), pp.30-38.
Kokubo T. et al. .., 1991.12(2), pp.155- 163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(91)90194-F
L. Lefebvre et al. .., 2007, 55, 3305–3313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.029
Li R. et al. ..,1991. 2(4), pp.231-239.
Manda et al. .., 2012. 38(7), pp.5585-5596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.03.078
Nawaz et al. .., 2021.41(2), pp.1695-1706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.09.052
Ohlberg S.M. and Strickler D.W., 1962. 45(4), pp.170-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1962.tb11114.x
P.Paramita et al. .., 2021. 32(1), pp.1-11.
Pirayesh H. and Nychka, J.A., 2013. 96(5), pp.1643-1650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.12190
Plewinski M. et al. .., al., 2013. 29(12), pp.1256- 1264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.09.016
Q. Nawaz. et al. .., 2020.103(8), pp.4234- 4247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.17124
R.R. Chandran et al. .., 2021. 45(34), pp.15350- 15362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D1NJ01058A
Ramila A et al. ..,2002.14(2), pp.542-548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/cm0110876
S. Kashyap et al. .., 2011.31, 762-769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2010.06.019
S. Prakrathi et al. .., 2018, p.020091.
Sepulveda P et al. .., 2001. 58(6), pp.734-740. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10026
Vallet Regí M et al. .., 2016.7(2), pp.195- 205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijag.12205
X.Liu et al. .., 2013. 9(6), pp.7025-7034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.02.026