A Review on the Approach Towards Cyber Physical Manufacturing System Architecture for Mining and Production Industries

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Atul
     Alliance College of Engineering and Design, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Alliance University, Bangalore - 562106, Karnataka ,IN
  • G. Divya Deepak
     Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal – 576104, Karnataka ,IN
  • Ranjan Kumar
     Department of Mechanical Engineering, Swami Vivekananda University, Kolkata - 700121, West Bengal ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2023/43064

Keywords:

CPMS, Intelligent Service, Metal, Mining, Manufacturing

Abstract

Conceptualization of Cyber-Physical Manufacturing System (CPMS) is a comprehensive zone of engineering which provide supports in terms of applications across mining sectors and any manufacturing domains metal industry, air transportation, mining activities, critical infrastructure, health care and medicine, intelligent transportation, robotic for service, and special smart manufacturing etc. CPMS is an emerging technology in facilitating the conversion from conventional to automation and is translating complete scenario of manufacturing. This paper deals with a review on an approach towards the CPMS architecture based on smart services for manufacturing systems like mining and metal industries. This paper introduces the review on an implementation example of an approach in mining and manufacturing industries, instantiating the conceptual architecture using unique technologies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2024-05-24

How to Cite

Atul, Divya Deepak, G., & Kumar, R. (2024). A Review on the Approach Towards Cyber Physical Manufacturing System Architecture for Mining and Production Industries. Journal of Mines, Metals and Fuels, 71(12A), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.18311/jmmf/2023/43064

Issue

Volume 71, Issue 12A , 2023

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

 

References

Mehandjiev N, Grefen P. Dynamic business process formation for instant virtual enterprises. Springer; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-691-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-691-5

Verstraete P, Germain BS, Valckenaers Brussel HV, Belle J, Hadeli K. Engineering manufacturing control systems using PROSA and delegate MAS. International Journal of Agent-Oriented Software Engineering. 2008; 2(1):62– 89. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAOSE.2008.016800 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAOSE.2008.016800

Shen W, Li Y, Hao Q, Wang S, Ghenniwa H. Implementing collaborative manufacturing with intelligent Web ser- vices. The Fifth International Conference on Computer and Information Technology, CIT 2005, IEEE Computer Society. 2005; 1063–9.

Leitao P, Ma V, Vrba P. Past, Present, and Future of Industrial Agent. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2012.2222034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2012.2222034

Jacobson C. Cyber-Physical Systems. ERCIM NEWS, broj 97; 2014.

Lee EA, Seshia SA. Introduction to embedded systems: A cyberphysical systems approach. MIT Press; 2016.

Shi J, Wan J, Yan H, Suo H. A survey of cyber-physical sys- tems. Wireless Communications and Signal Processing (WCSP), 2011 International Conference on IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/WCSP.2011.6096958 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/WCSP.2011.6096958

Gunes V, Peter S, Givargis T, Vahid F. A survey on concepts, applications, and challenges in cyber- physical systems. TIIS. 2014; 8(12):4242-68. https://doi.org/10.3837/ tiis.2014.12.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3837/tiis.2014.12.001

Bagheri B, Yang S, Kao HA, Lee J. Cyber-physical systems architecture for self-aware machines in industry 4.0 environment. IFAC-Papers Online. 2015; 48(3):1622-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.318 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.318

Jain S, Lechevalier D, Woo J, Shin SJ. Towards a virtual fac- tory prototype in: 2015 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), IEEE. 2207-18. https://doi.org/10.1109/ WSC.2015.7408333 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2015.7408333

Grangel GI, Hoffmeister M. Towards a semantic admin- istrative shell for industry 4.0 components. 2016 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC), IEEE. 230-7.

Colledani M, Tolio T, Fischer A, Iung B, Vancza J. Design and management of manufacturing systems for produc- tion quality. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology. 2014; 63(2):773-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cirp.2014.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2014.05.002

Hanif SM, Abul KM, Dafflon B, Moalla N, Ouzrout Y. Challenges of CPS for manufacturing in industry 4.0: a literature review. Elsevier Journal. 2016.

IEC, About IEC; 2016. [Online]. Available: http://www. iec.ch/about/, Accessed on April 10, 2017.

Storch RL, Lim S. Improving Flow to Achieve Lean Manufacturing in Shipbuilding. Production Planning and Control. 1999; 10(2):127–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/095372899233280 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/095372899233280

Heike G, Moinzadeh K. Mixed model assembly alternatives for low-volume manufacturing: the case of the aerospace industry. International Journal of Production Economics. 2001; 72:102–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0925-5273(00)00089-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(00)00089-X

Noack D, Rose O. A simulation-based optimization algo- rithm for slack reduction and workforce scheduling. in Proceedings of the 2008 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE. 2008; 1989–94. https://doi.org/10.1109/ WSC.2008.4736293 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2008.4736293

Mas F, Rios J, Menendez JL, Gomez A. A process-oriented approach to modelling the conceptual design of air- craft assembly lines. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2012.

Majohr MF. Heuristik zur personalorientierten Steuerung komplexer Montageprozesse. PhD thesis, Dresden University of Technology; 2008.

Rios J, Mas F, Menendez JL. Aircraft final assembly line balancing and workload smoothing: a methodical analy- sis. Key Engineering Materials. 2012; 502:19–24. https:// doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.502.19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.502.19

Horenburg T, Wimmer J, Gunthner WA. Resource Allocation in Construction Scheduling based on Multi- Agent Negotiation. in Proceedings 14th International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering. 2012.

Heuvel WJVD, Maamar Z. Moving toward a framework to compose intelligent web services. Communications of the ACM. 2003; 46:103–9. https:// doi.org/10.1145/944217.944220 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/944217.944220

Ziyaeva G, Choi E, Min D. Content-based intelligent routing and message processing in enterprise service bus. International Conference on Convergence and Hybrid Information Technology (ICHIT ’08), IEEE. 2008. p. 245–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHIT.2008.267 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHIT.2008.267

Goryachev A, Kozhevnikov S, Kolbova E, Kuznetsov O, Simonova E, Skobelev P, Tsarev A, Shepilov Y. Smart factory: intelligent system for workshop resource allocation, scheduling, optimization and controlling in real time. Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Manufacturing, of Advanced Materials Research, Switzerland: Trans Tech Publications. 2013; 630:508–13. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/ AMR.630.508 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.630.508

Inden U, Mehandjiev N, Monch L, Vrba P. Towards an Ontology for Small Series Production. 6th International Conference on Industrial Applications of Holonic and Multi-Agent Systems (HoloMAS’13), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer; 2013. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-642-40090-2_12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40090-2_12

EADS, Use-Case Definition (use cases 1 and 2), tech. rep., ARUM Consortium; 2013.