Safety Assessment of Ciprofloxacin and Roxithromycin through Haematological and Biochemical Profiling in Poultry

Jump To References Section

Authors

  • Department of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Sardarkrushinagar – 385506, Gujarat ,IN
  • Department of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Sardarkrushinagar – 385506, Gujarat ,IN
  • Department of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Sardarkrushinagar – 385506, Gujarat ,IN
  • Department of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Sardarkrushinagar – 385506, Gujarat ,IN
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry Kamdhenu University, Sardarkrushinagar – 385506, Gujarat ,IN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18311/ti/2024/v31i2/34752

Keywords:

Ciprofloxacin, Haemato-biochemical Evaluation, Poultry, Repeated oral Administration, Roxithromycin

Abstract

The concurrent therapeutic application of ciprofloxacin and roxithromycin has been suggested as a potential approach for addressing mixed bacterial infections in poultry. The present investigation aimed to determine the hematological and biochemical safety profile of concurrently administered ciprofloxacin and roxithromycin through the oral route in poultry. This study involved a total of sixteen birds, which were divided into two equal but random groups of broiler chickens. In the first group, roxithromycin alone was administered orally for five days. Conversely, the Group II birds received repeated concurrent doses of roxithromycin and ciprofloxacin for consecutive five days adhering to their recommended therapeutic dosages. In both groups, blood samples were collected at various intervals, including before drug administration (0 days), and at 6 hours, 12 hours, 1st day, 2nd day, 3rd day, 4th day, 5th day, 7th day, and 10th day. Following haematological and biochemical analyses, a two-way statistical analysis (p ≤ 0.05) was conducted utilizing unpaired ‘t-tests’ to compare parameters within the group across various time points and between Groups I and II. The analysis revealed statistically significant differences in haematological parameters such as heterophils, lymphocytes and monocytes, along with one biochemical parameter, specifically aspartate transaminase. Notably, the altered values primarily remained within the normal range and were often attributed to age-related changes, with certain fluctuations being of a temporary nature and reverting to normal levels by the 10th Day. The study findings support the conclusion that the concurrent oral administration of roxithromycin and ciprofloxacin appears to be safe for therapeutic use in poultry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2024-05-09

How to Cite

Singh, R. D., Patel, H. B., Sarvaiya, V. N., Raval, S. H., & Devi, S. (2024). Safety Assessment of Ciprofloxacin and Roxithromycin through Haematological and Biochemical Profiling in Poultry. Toxicology International, 31(2), 335–342. https://doi.org/10.18311/ti/2024/v31i2/34752
Received 2023-08-16
Accepted 2023-12-01
Published 2024-05-09

 

References

Landoni MF, Albarellos G. The use of antimicrobial agents in broiler chickens. Vet J. 2015; 205(1):21-7. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.04.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.04.016

Gaynor M, Mankin AS. Macrolide antibiotics: Binding site, mechanism of action, resistance. Curr Top Med Chem. 2003; 3(9):949-60. https://doi. org/10.2174/1568026033452159 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1568026033452159

Markham A, Faulds D. Roxithromycin: An update of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use. Drugs. 1994; 48:297-326. https://doi. org/10.2165/00003495-199448020-00011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199448020-00011

Patel T, Marmulak T, Gehring R, Pitesky M, Clapham MO, Tell LA. Drug residues in poultry meat: A literature review of commonly used veterinary antibacterials and anthelmintics used in poultry. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2018; 41(6):761-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvp.12700 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jvp.12700

Na Lampang K, Chongsuvivatwong V, Kitikoon V. Pattern and determinant of antibiotics used on broiler farms in Songkhla province, southern Thailand. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2007; 39:355-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-007- 9023-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-007-9023-3

Singh RD, Mody SK, Patel HB, Sarvaiya VN, Patel BR. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of roxithromycin and ciprofloxacin in treating complicated avian mycoplasmosis in broiler chickens. Indian J Anim Sci. 2020; 90(10):1346-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v90i10.111253

Brown SA. Fluoroquinolones in animal health. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 1996; 19:1-14. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.1996.tb00001.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.1996.tb00001.x

Papich MG. Fluoroquinolone antimicrobial drugs. In: Riviere JE, Papich MG (eds). Veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics (Tenth edition). John Wiley & Sons Inc., USA; 2018. p. 953-87.

Webber M, Piddock LJ. Quinolone resistance in Escherichia coli. Vet Res. 2001; 32(3-4):275-84. https://doi.org/10.1051/ vetres:2001124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/vetres:2001124

Singh RD, Mody SK, Patel HB, Sarvaiya VN, Patel SS, Prajapati BI, Srivastava AK. Revisiting PK-PD integration of ciprofloxacin against Escherichia coli in broiler chickens. J Vet Pharmacol Toxicol. 2022; 21(2):19-22.

Singh RD, Mody SK, Patel HB, Sarvaiya VN, Raval SH, Patel HA, Patel SS. Effect of multiple oral administrations of ciprofloxacin on haemato-biochemical parameters in broiler chickens. J Vet Pharmacol Toxicol. 2019; 18(2):60-3.

Bernard FF, Joseph GZ, Jain NC. Schalm’s Veterinary Hematology (Fifth edition). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, USA; 2000.

Samour J. Diagnostic value of hematology. In: Harrison GJ, Lightfoot T (eds). Clinical Avian Medicine, Volume-II. Spix Publishing, USA: Palm Beach, Florida; 2006. p. 587-610. 14. Pandian C, Pandiyan MT, Sundaresan A, Omprakash AV. Haematological profile and erythrocyte indices in different breeds of poultry. Int J Livest Res. 2012; 2(3):89-92.

Kalita D, Sultana R, Roy M, Bharali K. Comparative study of certain biochemical profile of broiler and indigenous chicken of Assam. Appro Poult Dairy and Vet Sci (NY). 2018; 2(4):544. https://doi.org/ 10.31031/APDV.2018.02.000544 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31031/APDV.2018.02.000544

Alam M, Ohid Ullah M, Umme FM, Shahidul IM. Broiler and indigenous chickens: A comparison through biochemical parameters. Int J Sustain Agric Res. 2020; 7(4):228-33. https://doi.org/ 10.18488/journal.70.2020.74.228.233 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.70.2020.74.228.233

Cafe MB, Rinaldi FP, Morais HR, de Mattos Nascimento MR, Mundim AV, Marchini CFP. Biochemical blood parameters of broilers at different ages under thermoneutral environment. Conference paper presented at World Poultry Congress, 2012, Aug 5-9; Salvador, Brazil; 2012.

Awadallah H, Awidat S, Bennour E, Elhafi G, El-Mahmoudy A. Safety profile of clarithromycin in broilers after repeated oral administration. Int J Biol Res. 2016; 4(2):263-8. https:// doi.org/10.14419/ijbr.v4i2.6689 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14419/ijbr.v4i2.6689

Etim NAN, Akpabio U, Okpongete RO, Offiong EAA. Do diets affect haematological parameters of poultry? Br J Appl Sci Technol. 2014; 4(13):1952-65. https://doi.org/10.9734/ BJAST/2014/8900 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2014/8900

Elsayed M, Elkomy A, Aboubakr M, Morad M. Tissue residues, hematological and biochemical effects of tilmicosin in broiler chicken. Vet Med Int. 2014:02872. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/502872 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/502872