Eco-friendly management of false smut disease of rice incited by Ustilaginoidea virens through the application of Trichoderma spp
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/2022/30756Keywords:
Antagonistic activity, control efficacy, mycoparasitism, organ-specific, propiconazole, yield gainAbstract
False smut disease of rice incited by Ustilaginoidea virens is an organ-specific pathogen that causes chalkiness of grain which leads to a reduction in 1000 grain test weight and yield. The dual culture assay results revealed that each Trichoderma isolates suppress the mean mycelial growth of U. virens under in-vitro conditions. Among the nine different Trichoderma isolates, 3 isolates were selected as effective isolates viz., TKM1, TKT9 and TTN5. Among these three effective isolates, maximum mycelial growth inhibition was recorded in the isolate TKM1 with 80.18 percentage reduction over control. The SEM photographs revealed that the hyphal round off in U. virens which is mainly due to the production of volatiles through direct antagonistic activity and competition through indirect antagonistic activity in which conidial adherence of T. harzianum over the surface of the mycelial mat of U. virens was observed. In 2020, the field experiment results revealed that the minimum disease severity was recorded when the Trichoderma isolate TKM1 was sprayed during booting stage with 4.61%, 50% PE stage with 17.91% and 100% PE with 21.86%. In 2021 the disease severity varied from 9.21% to 69.59%. The lowest disease severity was recorded in the plots sprayed with propiconazole fungicide with 9.21%. However, the disease severity recorded in fungicide treated plots were statistically on par with the Trichoderma isolate TKM1 treated plots at 50% PE spray with 10.60%. The disease severity recorded in the plots sprayed with TKM1 showed non-significant relationship with the fungicide treated plots which clearly revealed that the control efficacy of both TKM1 and Propiconazole treated plots were similar with each other. Among the Trichoderma treated plots the yield gain varied from 10.01% to17.20%. The yield gain was found to be 18.35% in fungicide treated plots. The yield and yield gain obtained by the effective isolate TKM1 (yield = 6405 kg/ha and yield gain = 17.20%) was statistically on par with propiconazole treated plots and significantly showed better yield and yield gain than the control plots. In 2021 among the Trichoderma treated plots the yield gain varied from 4.10% to 10.16%. The maximum yield gain was recorded in the fungicide treated plots (12.00%).
Downloads
Metrics
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 P Anbazhagan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2022-08-18
Published 2022-12-14
References
Andargie M, Li L, Feng A, Zhu X, Li J. 2018. Mapping of the Quantitative Trait Locus (QTL) conferring resistance to rice false smut disease. Curr Plant Biol. 15:38–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpb.2018.11.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpb.2018.11.003
Baite MS, Sharma R. 2015. Isolation technique and culture conditions of false smut pathogen (Ustilaginoidea virens) on rice. Indian Phytopathol. 68:50–5.
Biswas A. 2001. Field Reaction of Hybrid Rice Varieties to False Smut (FSm) and Kernel Smut (KSm) siseases in West Bengal, India. Environment and Ecology. 19:229– 30.
Chen X, Li P, Liu H, Chen X, Huang J, Luo C, Li, G, Hsiang T, Collinge DB, Zheng L. 2021. A novel transcription factor UvCGBP1 regulates development and virulence of rice false smut fungus Ustilaginoidea virens. Virulence. 12:1563–79. PMid: 34348597 PMCid: PMC8344781. https://doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2021.1936768 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2021.1936768
Samy L, Madamshetty SP, Vellaichamy YP, Donempudi K, Banda S, Singh R, Prasad V, Lore JS, Jain J, Mariappan S. 2019. Geographic distribution of false smut disease of rice in India and efficacy of selected fungicides for its management. Int. J. Pest Manag. 65:177–85. https://doi. org/10.1080/09670874.2018.1494865 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2018.1494865
Fan J, Liu J, Gong ZY, Xu PZ, Hu XH, Wu J L, Li GB, Yang J, Wang YQ, Zhou YF. 2020. The false smut pathogen Ustilaginoidea virens requires rice stamens for false smut ball formation. Environ. Microbiol. 22:646–59. PMid: 31797523 PMCid: PMC7028044. https://doi. org/10.1111/1462-2920.14881 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14881
Handelsman J, Stabb EV. 1996. Biocontrol of soilborne plant pathogens. The Plant Cell. 8:1855. PMid: 12239367 PMCid: PMC161320. https://doi.org/10.2307/3870235 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3870235
Ikegami H. 1960. Studies on the false smut of Rice, IV. Infection of the false smut due to inoculation with chlamydospores and ascospores at the booting stage of Rice plants. Res. Bull. Gifu College of Agriculture.
Jayalakshmi R, Sobanbabu G, Oviya R, Mehetre S, Kannan R, Paramasivam M, Santhanakrishnan V, Kumar K, Theradimani M, Ramamoorthy V. 2021. Evaluation of gliotoxin phytotoxicity and gliotoxin producing Trichoderma virens for the suppression of damping off of tomato. J. Biocontrol. 35:187–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18311//jbc/2021/27794
Kannahi M, Dhivya S, Senthilkumar R. 2016. Biological control on rice false smut disease using Trichoderma species. Int J Pure App Biosci. 4:311–6. https://doi. org/10.18782/2320-7051.2237 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.2237
Kohl J, Kolnaar R, Ravensberg WJ. 2019. Mode of action of microbial biological control agents against plant diseases: relevance beyond efficacy. Front. Plant Sci. 845. PMid: 31379891 PMCid: PMC6658832. https:// doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00845 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00845
Kumar, SN, Devi GU, Jagadeeshwar R, Ladhalakshmi, D. 2015. Physiological and Viability Studies of Pseudomorphs of False Smut of Rice Caused by Ustilaginoidea virens. Res. J. Agric. Sci. 6:697–9.
Ladhalakshmi D, Laha G, Singh R, Karthikeyan A, Mangrauthia S, Sundaram R, Thukkaiyannan P, Vikraktamath, B. 2012. Isolation and characterization of Ustilaginoidea virens and survey of false smut disease of rice in India. Phytoparasitica. 40:171–6. https://doi. org/10.1007/s12600-011-0214-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-011-0214-0
Ramamoorthy V, Viswanathan R, Raghuchander T, Prakasam V, Samiyappan R. 2001. Induction of systemic resistance by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in crop plants against pests and diseases. Crop Prot. 20:1–11. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(00)00056-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(00)00056-9
Song JH, Wei W, Lv B, Lin Y, Yin WX, Peng YL, Schnabel G, Huang JB, Jiang DH, Luo C X. 2016. Rice false smut fungus hijacks the rice nutrients supply by blocking and mimicking the fertilization of rice ovary. Environ. Microbiol. 18:3840–9. PMid: 27129414. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13343 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13343
Tang J, Chen X, Yan Y, Huang J, Luo C, Tom H, Zheng L. 2021. Comprehensive transcriptome profiling reveals abundant long non‐coding RNAs associated with development of the rice false smut fungus, Ustilaginoidea virens. Environ. Microbiol. 23:4998–5013. PMid: 33587785. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15432 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15432
Tsuda M, Sasahara M, Ohara T, Katto S. 2006. Optimal application timing of simeconazole granules for control of rice kernel smut and false smut. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 72:301–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10327-006-0288-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10327-006-0288-6
Weindling R. 1932. Trichoderma lignorum as a parasite of other soil fungi. Phytopathol. 22:837–45.
Whipps JM. 2001. Microbial interactions and biocontrol in the rhizosphere. J. Exp. Bot. 52:487–511. PMid: 11326055. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/52.suppl_1.487 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/52.suppl_1.487
Yang L, Chen L, Xu J, Liu J, Ding K. 2012. Estimation of yield loss caused by rice false smut. J. Anhui Agric. Univ. 39:474–7.
Yong M, Deng Q, Fan L, Miao J, Lai C, Chen H, Yang X, Wang S, Chen F, Jin L. 2018. The role of Ustilaginoidea virens sclerotia in increasing incidence of rice false smut disease in the subtropical zone in China. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 150:669–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658- 017-1312-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-017-1312-8
Zhou Y, Yu J, Pan X, Yu M, Du Y, Qi Z, Zhang R, Song T, Yin X, Liu Y. 2019. Characterization of propiconazole field-resistant isolates of Ustilaginoidea virens. Pestic Biochem Phys. 153:144–51. PMid: 30744888. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2018.11.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2018.11.013